Is the deal dead? No, but the hilarious delusions of microsoft lawyers and pr organs that the deal would sail through easily and unmolested is dead.so… is it over?
Phil now has the opportunity to save face by just taking the mobile King which according to him is the objective to fight the evil forces of Google and Apple Mobile duopoly. Unfortunately we all know that’s a lie and this will prove it.so… is it over?
GamesIndustry.biz: "The CMA found that 24% of Call of Duty PlayStation gamers said they would leave Sony's console if Xbox made the franchise exclusive to its platforms. One of the key arguments from Xbox is that the deal would allow it to put Activision Blizzard games on Game Pass, offering consumers more choice on how to pay for its games. Yet the CMA feels that as this would harm PlayStation users and competition, the downsides outweigh the benefits."
ugh the drama continues!MS will likely keep fighting.
I always said it wasn’t going to be easy but people said I was wrong.Is the deal dead? No, but the hilarious delusions of microsoft lawyers and pr organs that the deal would sail through easily and unmolested is dead.
Phill is only talk, no action! If I had a euro for every time he does a “phill says” on the media I would be a millionaire.Phil now has the opportunity to save face by just taking the mobile King which according to him is the objective to fight the evil forces of Google and Apple Mobile duopoly. Unfortunately we all know that’s a lie and this will prove it.
She must be seething right now.Lulu Cheng is desperate once again on Twitter. Always a fun read seeing her desperate because she will lose money if this falls through.
Fuck Microsoft. I hope it falls through.CMA appears to say either divest/split off Activision and COD or no deal.
UK regulator suggests removing Call of Duty from Microsoft’s Activision Blizzard acquisition | VGC
In its provisional conclusion, the CMA says Xbox’s Activision deal ‘could harm’ players…www.videogameschronicle.com
MS as a whole can pump a lot of money into the Xbox division (hence the huge acquisition). Sony as a whole can't do that to the same degree, so it isn't a fair comparison.I've read posts on other forums saying that because Playstation makes a lot more money than Xbox, then Microsoft buying ABK to improve the revenue stream of Xbox is fair...
...They say that without mentioning the elephant in the room of Microsoft's "infinite war chest". (which is a meme xbots use to explain why xbox will always win because they can dip into Microsoft's war chest)
Some posters on GAF are bad but ERA is on another level. Total Xbox and Phil sycophants, you get banned right away if you criticize this deal. The GP shills and xbots there are a scary cult.Just went to read ERA and they’re trying to spin this as a positive outcome. They’re delusional af
I was permabanned for saying MS had monopolistic tendencies it seems both the FTC and CMA agree with meI'm glad the CMA and the FTC are both blocking this illegal deal. MS needs to make their own games or get the fuck out of gaming.
Some posters on GAF are bad but ERA is on another level. Total Xbox and Phil sycophants, you get banned right away if you criticize this deal. The GP shills and xbots there are a scary cult.
Hence xbox's existence at all.MS as a whole can pump a lot of money into the Xbox division (hence the huge acquisition). Sony as a whole can't do that to the same degree, so it isn't a fair comparison.
It basically is, though. Even if MS accepts to diversity ABK, no way ABK will accept this. and the remedies won’t be enough to satisfy the CMA. They’ll try but it’s essentially deadNot quite, but definitely on the ropes.