you shouldn't, that is an intentional creative choice. Is more realisticJust watched the IGN review. I am kinda shocked at how bad the game looks most of the time.
you shouldn't, that is an intentional creative choice. Is more realisticJust watched the IGN review. I am kinda shocked at how bad the game looks most of the time.
Great point. I often look at real life and am disappointed with the visuals.you shouldn't, that is an intentional creative choice. Is more realistic
Man even SuperGT and Jimmy shiting on the game…
After watching this, this game is not even simcade, it's arcade.
Anyone with misplaced enough priorities to buy a 4090 deserves it.Shitty game and the PC build is atrocious even on a 4090
Yeah lol, it's so transparent.Resetera trying to create some narrative that games in the 80s are better than games that score in the 90s lol
I often prefer "80+ games" to "90+ games". Who's with me?
It's pretty straightforward to explain actually. Since what feels like 20 years (around Metacritic launch maybe?), often, when I play a "90+ game", I feel like "yeah, it's good, no doubt about it, buuuuuuuut ..." Whereas sometimes (not always of course), when I play a "80+ game", I'm like...www.resetera.com
They had to after Starfield and Forza
Its limited budget, gamepass gen.Having a quick scroll on twatter....It´s clear that the Xbox people are mentally damaged already; they live in this world in which everybody hates Xbox, the media is bias against the brand and its games. They see an 80 something as a faliure or a byproduct of Review Bombing. Review Scores Dont Matter! they say while sobbing, read the content of the reviews or listen to reviewers you trust. Well, i mean....when you listen or read a wide range of reviews, this game feels like a 7/10.
Is really unimpressive from a visual point of view...Is this "Next-Gen"?....it comes a cross like a cross-gen title.
That is metal damage level imo.Resetera trying to create some narrative that games in the 80s are better than games that score in the 90s lol
I often prefer "80+ games" to "90+ games". Who's with me?
It's pretty straightforward to explain actually. Since what feels like 20 years (around Metacritic launch maybe?), often, when I play a "90+ game", I feel like "yeah, it's good, no doubt about it, buuuuuuuut ..." Whereas sometimes (not always of course), when I play a "80+ game", I'm like...www.resetera.com
They had to after Starfield and Forza
Xbox players are too stupid to understand what opportunity cost is. Wasting time on a 1/10 because it's "free". Truly amazing. And people cheer this mentality too, Microsoft could offer up a steaming pile of shit included with GP and they'd be saying "No other publisher offers this!"The scores don't matter has begun View attachment 2469
Resetera trying to create some narrative that games in the 80s are better than games that score in the 90s lol
I often prefer "80+ games" to "90+ games". Who's with me?
It's pretty straightforward to explain actually. Since what feels like 20 years (around Metacritic launch maybe?), often, when I play a "90+ game", I feel like "yeah, it's good, no doubt about it, buuuuuuuut ..." Whereas sometimes (not always of course), when I play a "80+ game", I'm like...www.resetera.com
They had to after Starfield and Forza
Seems like IGN video gone private.
I wonder what happened
BTW Alex is saying the color gamma is a bug only on Xbox.