Without exclusivity, these games wouldn't get made at all. Look at Valve, they don't make anything anymore. Sony would be the same.All right I'll bite
Why should I care about or want Nintendo/Sony/Microsoft to have exclusives
Without exclusivity, these games wouldn't get made at all. Look at Valve, they don't make anything anymore. Sony would be the same.All right I'll bite
Why should I care about or want Nintendo/Sony/Microsoft to have exclusives
Did you miss the leaks of the new multiplayer shooter Valve is working on or...?Without exclusivity, these games wouldn't get made at all. Look at Valve, they don't make anything anymore. Sony would be the same.
A VR game in over a decade and the other is made by someone else. Same as DOTA or Counterstrike. They were made by outside developers and they bought the finished product (they were free mods actually). The laziest company on planet earth.Did you miss the leaks of the new multiplayer shooter Valve is working on or...?
Half Life Alyx happened too.
Do you think it's a coincidence that some of the best games of all time happen to be console exclusives?All right I'll bite
Why should I care about or want Nintendo/Sony/Microsoft to have exclusives
Without exclusivity, these games wouldn't get made at all. Look at Valve, they don't make anything anymore. Sony would be the same.
Lol...the first single player game Valve made in a decade was ..... an exclusive created to sell their own hardware?? (the overpriced Index) Thank you for proving my point.Did you miss the leaks of the new multiplayer shooter Valve is working on or...?
Half Life Alyx happened too.
And why would Sony be like Valve, rather than like Square Enix/Koei Tecmo/Bandai Namco/Capcom/Sega/Spike Chunsoft/Nippon Ichi Software/etc?
Because they are platform-holders? I thought that was obvious. There's no incentive to make big and expensive tentpole releases if you're just going to give it away to your competitors, making their platforms even more attractive than yours.Neither of you answered my question
why would Sony/Nintendo/Microsoft be like Valve, rather than like Square Enix/Koei Tecmo/Bandai Namco/Capcom/Sega/Spike Chunsoft/Nippon Ichi Software/etc, all of whom for the most part release the majority of their games multiplat
I answered your question already... why are you being obtuse? Oh, cuz you're a PC super fan you guys are all obtuse and don't care about the truth.Neither of you answered my question
Huh?Why would Sony/Nintendo/Microsoft be like Valve, rather than like Square Enix/Koei Tecmo/Bandai Namco/Capcom/Sega/Spike Chunsoft/Nippon Ichi Software/Idea Factory/etc, all of whom for the most part release the majority of their games multiplat
What is this even supposed to mean? lmao, who said you needed exclusivity deals to make video games?You don't *need* exclusivity deals to be able to make video games
You can differentiate your console by making it have new/different functionality the way Nintendo does. The Wii sold like hotcakes and not because of exclusives but because everyone was excited to play party games with their motion controller.They also give each console its own unique identity and an opportunity to differentiate itself from competitors. Imagine if all games were on all platforms, what do you think would happen? The trillion dollar company would just create the most powerful console at the lowest price, because they'd be the only ones that can afford to take a big loss on hardware. It'd be the defacto console to own and would overtake market share. Which is probably why Phil was spreading so much anti exclusive FUD for so long.
Disingenuous PC gamers say they can differentiate themselves in other ways, but that's just stupid. No one is buying a console because it has a better UI or slightly better controller, exclusives are the end all be all, always have been and always will be
What do you mean huh
Because I didn't see your reply until after I posted that. Thank you for insulting me thoughI answered your question already... why are you being obtuse?
lmao you contradict yourselfYou can differentiate your console by making it have new/different functionality the way Nintendo does. The Wii sold like hotcakes and not because of exclusives but because everyone was excited to play party games with their motion controller.
Let me put this in another way: I want the video game industry to be like the movie industry, where all DVD and bluray players can play all dvds and blurays regardless of publisher. Do the dvd/bluray manufacturers suffer? Not at all.
What do you mean huh
3rd party publishers generally release their games multiplat. I want Sony/Nintendo/Microsoft to be the same way. Capcom didn't need an exclusivity deal for Resident Evil 4 Remake to be a rad af game.
The Wii absolutely did sell because of exclusives. The exclusives were built around its special functionality. Once again being disingenuousYou can differentiate your console by making it have new/different functionality the way Nintendo does. The Wii sold like hotcakes and not because of exclusives but because everyone was excited to play party games with their motion controller.
Gaming is a 300 billion dollar industry, the movie industry is only 30 billion, so you want gaming to significantly degenerate just so you can save a few dollars on a console? This is why I say people who are anti exclusivity don't think about it for more than 5 seconds, like children.Let me put this in another way: I want the video game industry to be like the movie industry, where all DVD and bluray players can play all dvds and blurays regardless of publisher. Do the dvd/bluray manufacturers suffer? Not at all.
I already addressed this earlier. You never answered my question, you think the fact that some of the best games of all time are exclusive is just a coincidence? You think it's a coincidence that Sony and Nintendo get nominated for GOTY every year while 99.99% multiplatform publishers never do? RE4 Remake is a remake....of a former exclusive The only multiplat publishers that can go toe to toe with Sony/Nintendo are Rockstar and CDPR, and they only release 1 game per generation.What do you mean huh
3rd party publishers generally release their games multiplat. I want Sony/Nintendo/Microsoft to be the same way. Capcom didn't need an exclusivity deal for Resident Evil 4 Remake to be a rad af game.
Its hard for me to answer this because I don't have mainstream tastes and don't enjoy most AAA titles. You never answered my question, you think the fact that some of the best games of all time are exclusive is just a coincidence? You think it's a coincidence that Sony and Nintendo get nominated for GOTY every year while 99.99% multiplatform publishers never do? RE4 Remake is a remake....of a former exclusive The only multiplat publishers that can go toe to toe with Sony/Nintendo are Rockstar and CDPR, and they only release 1 game per generation.
They always forget that fact. Exclusivity is part of every industry without any backlash. Video games is the only place where there's so much noise about it (specifically when it's Playstation vs PC or Xbox).And that's still an awful example, the movie industry does compete through exclusivity now that everything is streaming. Netflix, Amazon, Hulu, Paramount, Apple, etc all get into huge bidding wars over exclusivity rights. And they're all creating a ton of original content that can only be watched exclusively through on their own service. Some of them are best movies/shows in years too...I wonder why...it's almost like they need create great art to incentivize people to their service.....
I used to own Portal 2 on PS3 sirValve also keeps everything exclusive to their own platform but Trisha didn't even notice
Going back 2 gens to prove a point. I'm talking about DoTA 2, Counterstrike 2. You can only access in their store. Not Epic, not GOG. I wonder why? I thought only Sony did exclusivityI own Portal 2 on PS3 sir
no Sony isn't the only one that does exclusivity, but you have a point.Going back 2 gens to prove a point. I'm talking about DoTA 2, Counterstrike 2. You can only access in their store. Not Epic, not GOG. I wonder why? I thought only Sony did exclusivity
Don't worry, I already answered it for youIts hard for me to answer this because I don't have mainstream tastes and don't enjoy most AAA titles
These people that say it know exclusives are important, they just want PlayStation to fail and die off.They always forget that fact. Exclusivity is part of every industry without any backlash. Video games is the only place where there's so much noise about it (specifically when it's Playstation vs PC or Xbox).
Valve also keeps everything exclusive to their own platform but Trisha didn't even notice
It was a late port and it doesn't change the fact that when Valve was putting out top tier single player games, they only did it to build up their platform. If you wanted to play Half Life and Portal, you had to install Steam. Once they solidified themselves as the monopoly for PC digital sales, they stopped making single player games and felt comfortable porting a few games over to console. And as a result, we stopped getting those games until it was time to sell their headset. And they still haven't ported over Alyx, I wonder whyI own Portal 2 on PS3 sir
Most Valve games are multiplat. Its just they don't put out many games so all their releases are on older consoles.