That article is from 2007?For people who keep mentioning Take Two
Take-Two plans for growth, not sale
Take-Two Interactive Software Inc <TTWO.O> Chairman Strauss Zelnick, head of a new management team, said on Monday he prefers to run the publisher of the hit "Grand Theft Auto" video game series rather than sell it.www.reuters.com
Yeah and nothings changed for Zelnick. He's a buyer, not seller.That article is from 2007?
Could be the case. That would have been true to say of Activision before being bought tooYeah and nothings changed for Zelnick. He's a buyer, not seller.
Take-Two is ‘still looking’ for acquisition targets following record Zynga deal | VGC
Company plans to acquire mobile game firm for $12.7…www.videogameschronicle.com
Well, Kotick was afraid of being kicked out, so he cashed out.Could be the case. That would have been true to say of Activision before being bought too
Better for everyone if Take2 has no interest in being bought, but Sony need to be at the table if the option comes up.
MS is the one that approached ABK. Take Two is for sale just as much as ABK was, it's only a matter of how much it's going to cost. Shareholders don't care as long as they get enougth compensation. A private company like Valve is what might actually not be for sale but even that is questionable.Well, Kotick was afraid of being kicked out, so he cashed out.
Can't see that happening with Take Two.
?MS is the open that aproached ABK.
Yeah technically there's a magic number for anything. Nintendo is technically just as much for sale as ABK was, but we all know that's not gonna happen. So its a pretty useless line of thinking.Take Two is for sale just as much as ABK was, it's only a matter of how much it's going to cost. Shareholders don't care as long as they get enougth compensation. A private company like Valve is what migth actually not be for sale but even that is questionable.
Nintendo isn't because of them being a traditional Japanese company. Take Two is a lot more realistic.Yeah technically there's a magic number for anything. Nintendo is technically just as much for sale as ABK was, but we all know that's not gonna happen. So its a pretty useless line of thinking.
Yet you said "Shareholders don't care as long as they get enougth compensation."Nintendo isn't because of them being a traditional Japanese company. Take Two is a lot more realistic.
Then they should merge with Nintendo if that is a possibility. Win/win for Japan as well as most console players. MS is the one bringing US first and anti-Japanese rhetoric into it, there is hardly any overlap between Nintendo and Sony games/hardware rigth now. This is what consolidation leads to.Yet you said "Shareholders don't care as long as they get enougth compensation."
Nintendo has shareholders. No different than Take Two.
Why focus on Japanese publishers that don't make sense for MS to buy? If MS buys Sega so be it, they'll be irelevant if limited to Xbox.Take 2 would be a horrible purchase for a lot of reasons. One, some one would for make a counter offer much more than Sony could afford like a Amazon or Saudi government, it would face just as much, if not more scrutiny than this activison deal, it’d be very long process, and I don’t think regulators would let Microsoft get take 2 after getting activsion so there’s little reason to worry about them going anywhere.
If Sonys going to do these publisher buyouts just focus on Japanese companies that are a lot cheaper, the likelihood of a counter offer is much lower imo because of cultural differences and I think it’s have less stringent scrutiny from regulators.
Now an investment in take 2? Like a 2 or 3 billion dollar investment where gta and all take 2 games have permanent Sony marketing and perks? Sure why not.
I'm of the belief that all these CEOs want to cash out at some point. Strauss is 65 years old, what sort of retirement package does he want? A nice Rolex and a thank you or to get paid a premium on his $70 million in Take Two stockWell, Kotick was afraid of being kicked out, so he cashed out.
Can't see that happening with Take Two.
Saudis aren't taking over a major US gaming company, same with Chinese companies. Especially with the way the geopolitical winds are going. Amazon hadn't given a shit about even small acquisitions in gaming.Take 2 would be a horrible purchase for a lot of reasons. One, some one would for make a counter offer much more than Sony could afford like a Amazon or Saudi government, it would face just as much, if not more scrutiny than this activison deal, it’d be very long process, and I don’t think regulators would let Microsoft get take 2 after getting activsion so there’s little reason to worry about them going anywhere.
If Sonys going to do these publisher buyouts just focus on Japanese companies that are a lot cheaper, the likelihood of a counter offer is much lower imo because of cultural differences and I think it’s have less stringent scrutiny from regulators.
Now an investment in take 2? Like a 2 or 3 billion dollar investment where gta and all take 2 games have permanent Sony marketing and perks? Sure why not.
Certainly can't underestimate their greed.I'm of the belief that all these CEOs want to cash out at some point. Strauss is 65 years old, what sort of retirement package does he want? A nice Rolex and a thank you or to get paid a premium on his $70 million in Take Two stock