Only from Leakers. They are praising the game.
Are they "objective"?
Only from Leakers. They are praising the game.
Those that praise it like the coming of Jesus, yes. A lot of others are leaking just how bad this game is.Are they "objective"?
Nope, let's not do that. That's just cringe level fanboyism.I'm counting on Sony fanboys, for retaliation after what xbotz motherfuckers did to FF XVI. Bring the review bombing on yeah.
Nope, let's not do that. That's just cringe level fanboyism.
Sorry, but what's done is done. Xbotz brought it to themselves, they started it first. People simply do not forget.Nope, let's not do that. That's just cringe level fanboyism.
Don't worry we will make xbotz favorite game having miserable times .Should have renamed this game as saltfield. It's not even out ffs...
against Xbox you meanThe media bias for Xbox alone will get this game a 90, if it's even half way decent we're looking at a 95 no matter how many bugs or glitches.
I guess you guys are focusing too much in media bias.
Oblivion and Skyrim received avg. 94 even with zillions of bugs because it shows what Bethesda do better.
I don't thing it will be different with Starfield.
Nah.Bethesda do better what from software and CDPR do better: being media darlings. Skyrim would score a 70 or below were it from another developer. Fallout 4 the same. Cyberpunk, even without bugs, would score an 80 or less.
I think that we are above that... but who knows, some people have the time to spend on these things , go actually play the games instead.Nope, let's not do that. That's just cringe level fanboyism.
Nothing dethrones TOTK, GOTG runner up to It Takes Two.