brv....Startield is here to stay. a massive RPG UNIVERSE ready to be explored, add hundreds of MODs. The conversation is just beginning.
Starfield might be staying but I'm not so sure about you.brv....Startield is here to stay. a massive RPG UNIVERSE ready to be explored, add hundreds of MODs. The conversation is just beginning.
The hilarious thing about this is that the "vegetation" you're so proud of are just 2d sprite cards with high res textures layered on top. There's no life to it, no depth, you can even see as you pass one of the bushes that the leaves are 2d and not a 3d model, your feet clip through the grass instead of brushing them aside. It's hilarious that you think it looks as good as thisThose particular trees look bad but that's not representative of all the foliage in the game. Here is a vid of foliage looking like most current gen games look. It's a mirage on a moon on Tau Ceti.
you tell me. I am just trying to balance the energy here bro.Starfield might be staying but I'm not so sure about you.
you tell me. I am just trying to balance the energy here bro.
i saw a thread somewhere saying that there was no Sonya or Kano,I preordered MK1. I bought Cyberpunk for $10 and I barely played it so I'm not getting the DLC for $40.
I might play the vanilla if the free update is good.
It isn't like they could really make it much worse.I’m excited for Phantom Liberty. A complete rethink could be just what a previously troubled game needed. I just hope it doesn’t lose anything that’s currently fun about the game, and the changes are all for the better. That’s a risk with radically changing a known game.
David Jaffe says it's in his top three games of all time though
I don't thing he said or even imply that. in fact; he was the one really downplaying the possible success of Starfield.1 million concurrent players is a ‘huge’ win according to Phil. Am I missing something?
Game doesn't stutter for me
For steam, that’s bad. Games are usually on 90% approval. Users are not as harsh as professional reviewers and outlets, they’re more easier to please.We have a gazillion similar Starfield threads, maybe it would be a good idea to merge some of them.
I highly doubt that there may be any 'massive' refunds. Around 80% of positive reviews after maybe around 800K units sold in Steam is pretty good. It's too early, specially considering it's a long SP game I assume many people will take their time to make their review, specially the positive ones.
I think the reviews may end in the mid eighties.
Also, only those interested will spend 60 or 70 on a game at launch.For steam, that’s bad. Games are usually on 90% approval. Users are not as harsh as professional reviewers and outlets, they’re more easier to please.
I would think that any game that sells about 3-5 millions on Day 1 should have about 1 million CCU on launch day depending on time zones? It doesn't sound like a rare and impressive metric.1 million concurrent players is a ‘huge’ win according to Phil. Am I missing something?