So a game that doesn't look anything spectacular is bringing a 4090 to its knees and you're happy with that?
Damn, I thought you were smarter.
Starfield | Review & Discussion Thread
- Thread starter Gamernyc78
- Start date
So a game that doesn't look anything spectacular is bringing a 4090 to its knees and you're happy with that?
Damn, I thought you were smarter.
I’m way too tired to go into it right now but this game is like a 5 right now.
Old fashioned. Technically outdated. Extremely derivative. It’s not good.
Maybe it will change …
Old fashioned. Technically outdated. Extremely derivative. It’s not good.
Maybe it will change …
Yoooooo whose fucking man is this? This dude the ultimate schill, Im embarrassed to say he's from New York. All the schilling he did sure paid off, they sent him his merch asap.
Yo frozone you know this dude?
Marketing their game for them for free
A 5? i haven't played a single game where i would rate it a 5 lol. 5 is like the game shouldn't even exist imo. To each their own i suppose. it is a slow burn though.
His job security must be very low. He's been angling Xbot for a while now. Hoping MS will throw him a bone?Just catching up to everything now.....Gene Park gave it a perfect score?lord....
Genuinely pathetic slobbering.
There's no FOV slider in this game. There is, however, a workaround:
I would assume you can make the "100.0000" value any value and not just that one, so try and see what fits to your hearts content.
Source
Other people have reported that this works. This is what I will probably test first if they don't patch an FOV slider before general release:
I would assume you can make the "100.0000" value any value and not just that one, so try and see what fits to your hearts content.
Source
Other people have reported that this works. This is what I will probably test first if they don't patch an FOV slider before general release:
the scores are awful, lmao.
& from IGN and 7 from gamespot.
Holy
Crap
is this the biggest flop in industry history? It might be
Shocked that it flopped, really.
& from IGN and 7 from gamespot.
Holy
Crap
is this the biggest flop in industry history? It might be
Shocked that it flopped, really.
It scored 88. It didn't flop score wise, but it is far cry from game of the generation that some fanboys were hoping for.
Bugs
Framerate issues
Clipping Crashing
Odd camera angles while talking to npcs
Slow mediocre campaign that takes a while to get going
Bunch of planets with nothing to do but scan rocks
The PC version scoring higher than the Xbox version is a mystery considering all the performance issues and bugs it has. I genuinely don't understand how some games get a free pass on these issues, while others are completely destroyed by smaller ones.
But you also forgot to mention very limited exploration and traveling ( Bethesda said otherwise not so long ago ). Also, fly through planets. LOL
Just for comparison:
They were trying to take Final Fantasy XVI score down. See the difference in reviews.
They were trying to take Final Fantasy XVI score down. See the difference in reviews.
D
Deleted member 223
Guest
Creation engine is a pig with lipstick. Not surprising really.
Game is "lucky" ($$) to be at 87 Meta. That is MS $$ power - they wield it and use it. Whatever you think of the returns vs. the level of investment, it does have a clear effect.
With that said, it's not a Cyberpunk level disaster or up there with Fallout: New Vegas. Still, as a AAA exclusive flagship, while you have Microsoft, and everything at their disposal as a defense force, you also get more scrutiny just by the sheer amount of eyes, which that "defense force" must account for to manage and control. The oppossing forces balance themselves.
Game is "lucky" ($$) to be at 87 Meta. That is MS $$ power - they wield it and use it. Whatever you think of the returns vs. the level of investment, it does have a clear effect.
With that said, it's not a Cyberpunk level disaster or up there with Fallout: New Vegas. Still, as a AAA exclusive flagship, while you have Microsoft, and everything at their disposal as a defense force, you also get more scrutiny just by the sheer amount of eyes, which that "defense force" must account for to manage and control. The oppossing forces balance themselves.
Last edited by a moderator:
Bethesda should have created a new engine quite a while back. While they tout that Creation Engine is not the same as Gamebryo, it is pretty much the same thing with improved systems.
I think of Gamebryo as an engine that is tailor-made to their RPG needs, and Creation as Gamebryo with a lot of tacked-on features, like a house made of muddy foundation. They need a new baseline that seamlessly integrates with whatever their needs are going forward. Since I assume ESVI will be using CE again, I'd say they need a new engine for Starfield 2.
Just for comparison:
They were trying to take Final Fantasy XVI score down. See the difference in reviews.
143 reviews for FF16 vs only 51 reviews for Starfield
lol
Ign PC dude who hates bloodborne and soulsborne series is ps fanboy
Some funny copium shit this trash senjutsu guy