Popular thread was being pushed down by new less popular ones....
Enjoy your Starfield discussion!
Enjoy your Starfield discussion!
I just expect them to be so different they will be hard to compare. Just as Destiny is hard to compare to No Mans Sky despite both games involving owning space ships and going to different planets.
The dogfighting can be compared obviously once the games are out; some of the exploration aspects can be compared. But No Mans Sky has an infinite universe because that is core to the concept of the game. It does not have major cities and tons of storylines / side missions / etc. which will be the true core of Starfield.
I think it's perfectly fair to compare the like aspects, but ignoring that at their core they aren't even CLOSE to the same genre just seems ridiculous to me. There is no WRPG hidden inside of No Mans Sky, or Star Citizen or Elite Dangerous or any of the other games I've seen it oddly equated with as though that's how we should judge it.
It would be rather ridiculous for me to show up in a No Mans Sky thread and complain about the lack of it being a WRPG so why is it not considered ridiculous to complain Starfield isn't No Mans Sky when it comes to space travel? In the same sense you could compare the shooting of Destiny to the shooting of Starfield, but they are still in different genres w/ different expectations.
Of course I'm going to pick this up. I hope that the framerate improves as it's literally game-breaking for me. I'd like to compare it to NMS even though it's a single player experience.
Also, that's some next-gen foliage on display in the gameplay footage.
Even the rest of the environment looks really bad to me, to be honest.Yeah those flat painted on texture trees are nintendo level embarrassing. The rest of the environments look good though
I honestly didn't expect much from the game and had my doubts, and seems even with that it went below my expectations.
I'm one of those oddballs that love visuals over FPS. If the game chokes at FPS with all options on Ultra, I"ll have to limit the FPS to 30 (unfortunately).I mean it's gonna have plenty of config options on PC to get a framerate you desire on your hardware. Considering 40 series cards will be out by then, if you have the means I don't see why you won't be playing at 60FPS on PC.
I'm one of those oddballs that love visuals over FPS. If the game chokes at FPS with all options on Ultra, I"ll have to limit the FPS to 30 (unfortunately).
It also ran like shit on the powerful PC they showed it on, let alone consoles.I can't wait for this game for PC as I bet it runs like shit on the consoles.
Oh frame rate looked rough but its a Bethesda game so that kind of goes hand in hand.It also ran like shit on the powerful PC they showed it on, let alone consoles.
Oh frame rate looked rough but its a Bethesda game so that kind of goes hand in hand.
I plan on throwing a 4090 at it and see how it chugs with that