A PC game game not on Steam doesn't exist. I don't deny the existence of Zelda.Dude just hates console and feel entitled to everything being released on Steam.
To him a great game outside Steam might as well not exist.
A PC game game not on Steam doesn't exist. I don't deny the existence of Zelda.Dude just hates console and feel entitled to everything being released on Steam.
To him a great game outside Steam might as well not exist.
Because you play it on Yuzu for free right?A PC game game not on Steam doesn't exist. I don't deny the existence of Zelda.
that's true, if his goal is selling the hardware they need exclusives but covering the costs by selling exclusives only on one platform is so wrong these days, Nintendo gets away with it because they have kids buying multiple copies for their siblings...etc PS/Xbox don't have it anymore so they need the extra 1+ mil copies from PC
Because there's not one tier of Switch game that has modern features like party invites, controller input mapping, remote play, etc and another tier that is stone age. On Switch all games are stone age.Because you play it on Yuzu for free right?
I thought PC ports were supposed to be pure profit? Where did that profit go?
the purchase of bungie, the cancellation of last of us online, and the increasing production cost of Playstation 5?I thought PC ports were supposed to be pure profit? Where did that profit go?
Games nowadays have same scoop as last generation games and in many cases look inferior. However, they take longer to develop and cost more. I think the nature of competitiveness in the market led to higher salaries , and benefits with less work hours. Not only that but the highest percentage of cost is actually due to executive bonuses.The ports to PC will never make enough, R&C, TLOU, uncharted etc all sold very poorly on PC and even GOW and Horizon were soft.
Even with day 1, it would make little difference.
The real issue is that costs are far too high, too much superfluous content, too much bloat, studios in the most expensive places to live in the world, too many benefits and non production focused initiatives etc.
They need an axe man to go in and cut everything that is unnecessary or too expensive.
If the games are neither exclusive, nor profitable, then they serve no purpose. They can be one or the other or both but not neither.
They canceled 1000s of games before and PS5 cost is a fraction of PS3 cost.the purchase of bungie, the cancellation of last of us online, and the increasing production cost of Playstation 5?
You talking about the CD-ROM era? Kings Quest 6 and shit? Wing Commander 3?Anyone who is against exclusive software on unique hardware is not old enough to have lived through the golden era of gaming.
The only console with no identity is Xbox. It has no soul.there's no reason for a console to have an identity. dvd players don't have an identity. games forge a publisher's identity.
not that there isn't a certain hobbyist joy to vinyl records and record players, but if you're more excited by record player than the music, there's something wrong.
The average PC master racer, the moment all PlayStation games are on PC: "Why does PlayStation even exist, all their games are on PC? You can connect you PC to a TV with an HDMI cable and use an Xbox controller".
Can we stop feeding this nonsense. Sony does not have an issue with profit. All their games are profitable.The ports to PC will never make enough, R&C, TLOU, uncharted etc all sold very poorly on PC and even GOW and Horizon were soft.
Even with day 1, it would make little difference.
The real issue is that costs are far too high, too much superfluous content, too much bloat, studios in the most expensive places to live in the world, too many benefits and non production focused initiatives etc.
They need an axe man to go in and cut everything that is unnecessary or too expensive.
If the games are neither exclusive, nor profitable, then they serve no purpose. They can be one or the other or both but not neither.
As part of damage control, studio representatives can tell you how they really wanted to try a GaaS game, and for this they are ready to kill a successful IP, or as they say "to try something new, especially with multiplayer elements", because the development of the previous game was difficult and toxic (the first AAA on the problematic UE4, from a studio that made its last AAA project back in the PS1 era, and the result was amazing).Why do people insist in this lie? Days Gone was not slashed, their director did not want it and did not propose it to headquarters. GoT has been in development since 2020, and unfortunately they are also working on an online game, so they have the budgets.
the CEO of sony says they do. who do you think you're arguing with?Can we stop feeding this nonsense. Sony does not have an issue with profit. All their games are profitable.
Which game hasn't been profitable? Y'all acting like Sony just released Suicide Squad or Redfall. I can think of plenty of major bombs from Xbox or third parties. None from Sony
Sony games are regularly up and over 200m In revenue. There is scarcely a game here that didn't profit
Miles Morales alone could have gotten away with a 300 million budget
View attachment 4302
There is no issue with Sony's profit levels when everything they are making is turning profits.
What Sony wants, like every publisher, is to hit the lotto on the next Fortnite with ridiculous industry shaking margins. To that, yeah it's nice to want things. I want to hit the lotto too
It is ridiculous that is the expectation of investors and dumbass suits these days that you should make billions on a single product over a decade. But that's the world we are in
Can we stop feeding this nonsense. Sony does not have an issue with profit. All their games are profitable.
Which game hasn't been profitable? Y'all acting like Sony just released Suicide Squad or Redfall. I can think of plenty of major bombs from Xbox or third parties. None from Sony
Sony games are regularly up and over 200m In revenue. There is scarcely a game here that didn't profit
Miles Morales alone could have gotten away with a 300 million budget
View attachment 4302
There is no issue with Sony's profit levels when everything they are making is turning profits.
What Sony wants, like every publisher, is to hit the lotto on the next Fortnite with ridiculous industry shaking margins. To that, yeah it's nice to want things. I want to hit the lotto too
It is ridiculous that is the expectation of investors and dumbass suits these days that you should make billions on a single product over a decade. But that's the world we are in
Provide the quote where he says PS isn't profitablethe CEO of sony says they do. who do you think you're arguing with?
All these numbers are much better than anticipaded.Can we stop feeding this nonsense. Sony does not have an issue with profit. All their games are profitable.
Which game hasn't been profitable? Y'all acting like Sony just released Suicide Squad or Redfall. I can think of plenty of major bombs from Xbox or third parties. None from Sony
Sony games are regularly up and over 200m In revenue. There is scarcely a game here that didn't profit
Miles Morales alone could have gotten away with a 300 million budget
View attachment 4302
There is no issue with Sony's profit levels when everything they are making is turning profits.
What Sony wants, like every publisher, is to hit the lotto on the next Fortnite with ridiculous industry shaking margins. To that, yeah it's nice to want things. I want to hit the lotto too
It is ridiculous that is the expectation of investors and dumbass suits these days that you should make billions on a single product over a decade. But that's the world we are in