IconEra
Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Discussion Xbox fanatics social media meltdowns in regards to 3rd party move and other losses |OT| "When fiction meets reality.
- Thread starter Gamernyc78
- Start date
We're actually fucking winning LMAO
My arse is a more reliable source for Xbox news than Jizz Condom. The quality of the releases are about the same.
what happened?
Nah i got banned for posting a rational and realistic take in one of their not-supposed-to-be-allowed political posts and evilore didn't like my take so he put words in my mouth and permed me lmao. And to top it all off he was defending the one dude that no one in america cares about dying, the CEO guy.
can you share that rational and realistic take?
don't be distracted(with this Side Quest), but is it normal to be gun down in the morning in america that no one cares? or no one cares because it was that specific man?
Yeah basically.
It's not normal, the problem is he is the CEO of a company who likely caused the pain and suffering of tens of thousands of people, and likely deaths, because they wrongly denied health care to those his company insured, and on purpose (his company has by far the highest claim denial rate in the us, close to 1/3 of claims are denied - other insurances are ~15% or less).
In this thread Evilore was insisting that people should feel some type of sympathy for them and that the rule of law should be respected, I posted that this kind of thing is inevitable when the balance of power is so skewed in America and I linked a study done by one of the top universities in America showing that the American public has absolutely no say in what laws are passed and that the rule of law's legitimacy is dependent on the consent of the governed, and because the current system is in effect due to the actions of said CEO, that I wouldn't feel any sympathy for him.
Well he didn't like that and banned me because apparently murder is not ok. (Lol ignoring the fact that he's ok with a lot of other murders on that forum).
Oh, and he got so triggered he actually deleted my post LMAO
P.s. further context this is how the american public feels about the situation.
A Post From UnitedHealthcare Is Going Viral Because Over 71,000 People Reacted With Laughing Emojis
User ability to comment on the post has also been limited.
Last edited:
uch, this is rabbit hole i don't want to go today. but i think, when you discussing things like this, you have to do an internal critic of your position.
for example, can you reasonably demonstrate that CEO is directly responsible and not incompetent employees? etc etc.
for example, in my country, there is a government institution, where employees are injecting their own bias and can deny you on some things which can effect you in negative ways. imagine, if some one gun down CEO of the institution based on employees doing that shit.
i am just giving example of one instance. no need for further discussion.
i agree, it is inevitable in america. i also agree, that public has no say in what laws are passed.
The CEO is directly responsible for his company's policies as the only people above him are the board of directors.
And yes it was directly due to him.
"The insurer more than doubled the rate of denials for care following hospital stays between 2020 and 2022 as it implemented machine-assisted technology to automate the process, according to a Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigation’s report released in October. That far surpassed its competitors, including Humana, whose care denials grew 54% during the same time period."
can you demonstrate that company's policies weren't demanded by board of directors?
can you demonstrate that employees did their job properly? as reasonable assumption would be - CEO aren't approving or denying, employees do.
and we know for sure, in america, politics are so strong, that people inject their bias into their work all the time in unreasonable ways.
54 pages, lol, why would you do this to me? now i have to read it and i have no time
... If he disagreed with the board of directors he would have resigned. He has the highest authority and thus the responsibility lies with him.
In law there is a concept of criminality which is called "gross negligence". This is wikipedia's summation:
"a conscious, voluntary act or omission in reckless disregard of a legal duty and of the consequences to another party."
You didn't read the article. He replaced employees that were doing the denials with AI. That is a corporate decision made at the highest level, not something made by underlings. And replacing employees charged with handling life or death decisions with untested and unproven AI is an act of gross negligence.
Listen, is the CEO dying going to fix things? No. Am I encouraging people to go out and kill CEOs? No. All I'm saying is I don't feel any sympathy for him. And that's what got Evilore so mad he permed me and deleted my post lmao
Also it's really highly amusing to me that he of all people demands respect for the rule of law when he bans anyone that points out when certain countries violate international law and treaties
you just posted that document. of course i didn't read it, it's 54 pages
is there any mention of AI in the document, that AI was untested and unproven? is there mentions that CEO pushed this change and not the board of directors demanded it? i am just asking. or this is just your assumptions?
f.exp... i know for a fact, that board of directors can force the direction and demand certain implementations and CEO job is just implement those wishes the best as he can, and then, there is underlings, who are responsible of said implementations. for example, CEO isn't a coder or analyst of data, maybe, he was given different information than it actually was and he acted on that information. it could be or couldn't be the truth. but we clearly wouldn't know without court case.
It is literally his job to know those things. Who puts a drastic change like AI claim denial in place without knowing exactly what it entails? That is a massive liability risk and he would have been fully briefed on all the positive and negative aspects of this kind of change, and if he wasn't then he was doing a grossly negligent job. And you can literally look online at the experiences of any actual person who dealt with this insurance company before. It will be a litany of "worst experience" and "worst company to deal with" from customer and doctor alike.you just posted that document. of course i didn't read it, it's 54 pages
is there any mention of AI in the document, that AI was untested and unproven? is there mentions that CEO pushed this change and not the board of directors demanded it? i am just asking. or this is just your assumptions?
f.exp... i know for a fact, that board of directors can force the direction and demand certain implementations and CEO job is just implement those wishes the best as he can, and then, there is underlings, who are responsible of said implementations. for example, CEO isn't a coder or analyst of data, maybe, he was given different information than it actually was and he acted on that information. it could be or couldn't be the truth. but we clearly wouldn't know without court case.
It is very interesting that we are pulling all the stops out to eke out plausible deniability for one of the most powerful people in the country rather than admit they were simply not a good person who did not deserve any eulogies. His family has money enough to last generations and it is blood money taken from millions of people who were denied contractually obligated services.
Lmao xbox isn't even making back the money they spent on ABK let alone getting surplus to buy T2. What a delusional nutter
Another one talking about Wukong, everyone knows series s is a potato.