40 Minutes Of Starfield Gameplay Have Leaked Online
- Thread starter John Elden Ring
- Start date
Yeah, it's a Cyberpunk tier of AI reactivity
Cyberpunk had vehicles and more stuff, so it had to have more glitches as it was less predictable.
That game is barren and what's there looks like a mix ps3/4 era graphics. Add what we know about the limitations of its world and it's very underwhelming.
It got many of its good reception (scores) on unfulfilled promises.
The game would have been received much worse if the reviewers reviewed the product for what it was instead of some vague roadmap
What was there was also not good enough to keep people interested until the new contents dropped, even when it did drop what was delivered wasn't good enough to keep people interested or draw those that dropped out back in.
This is another Halo:I/Redfall moment from MS. A bad looking game that is just not that good anyway. Thankfully the shilling seems to have slowed down with the email leaks from the ABK court case and how bad Redfall is, the media people in the industry know that they are risking their reputation by shilling too hard for MS, gamers know they are clowns right away.
And you know with two pathological liars like Phil and Todd at the helm you are not going to know how a game is until others get their hands on it. They'll do all they can to manipulate the gaming media (press/influencers, etc.) To hide what is actually going on.
so, in your words, Starfield is a “bad looking game that is just not that good”?The cope is getting to dangerous levels in this thread. I’m loving it.
There is a point where a "review" must be considered PR piece and be presented as such.
I'm not sure the law has enough teeth to enforce something like that.
So it's some kind of graphical and gameplay masterpiece? I'm sorry, I was mean
The cope is getting to dangerous levels in this thread. I’m loving it.
. I was just caught coping and trying to downplay the true achievements behind the breakthrough game that Starfield is.
No, obviously not, but many reviewers have questionable relationships with Xbox and their reviews are more akin to press releases with a number at the end than actual reviews.
No it’s no a masterpiece, but it will be played and discussed for years to come. I’m not sure why you’re trying so hard to bash it though, oh wait, because you can’t play it…….So it's some kind of graphical and gameplay masterpiece? I'm sorry, I was mean
I was just caught coping and trying to downplay the true achievements behind the breakthrough game that Starfield is.
Luckily you have another rinse and repeat, 6 hour Spider-Man game coming to hold you over until Q4 2024.
Not just the UK, as others have pointed out, since some UK "people" have got it. Guess what, they are Xbot clowns.
Keep trying
Windows Central is in the UK and got it. You have been told this. Eurogamer and Digital Foundry are both UK based, but only one of them got the review code, even though both are part of the same company.
If you're not paid to make yourself look like a clown, you're an even sadder human being than I thought.
I’m asking you which major publications outside of UK haven’t received a review copy.
You're moving the goalpost, so I have no need to answer you. Some UK publications got it, debunking the astroturfer narrative that it's a country thing. I presented two such examples, with one of them being a publication about MS products, while the other was just visited by Phil Spencer.
No, I’m not. I’ve asked the same question from the beginning.
you literally said “it’s not just the UK”
so are you going to answer, or dodge?
Also, Phil didn’t visit DF. They were all at the game show dummy.
Lol you are a clown. Go check push square reviews of sony games. Go on. I wish Sony had bootlickers like Microsoft
Again, guys, ghostz is one of the pathetic wannabe shills who do this for free. Ignore it and the bot goes away. It craves attention it's not getting in real life.