I mean this certainly doesn't live up to what they've been hyping just like cyberpunk didn'tEh I don't think it that bad
Bethesda game, so still bad.
I mean this certainly doesn't live up to what they've been hyping just like cyberpunk didn'tEh I don't think it that bad
Bethesda game, so still bad.
AI looks about the sameCyberpunk had even worse AI and glitches
I hate when they have Npc that stand, then walk in a straight line, do a 90-degree turn and continue doing the same thing over and over again.Some new gameplay drops for those interested.
I hate when they have Npc that stand, then walk in a straight line, do a 90-degree turn and continue doing the same thing over and over again.
And the woman sitting down, it's like she is blind or something, it feels like she is not actually looking at your character and addressing someone who is standing in the back of the room.
I wonder if this is technically infringing on consumer rights somehow, intentionally trying to negate negative reviews, trying to make sure that the game receives an inflated review score, surely there are consumer watchdog committees out there that would think this is not fair.Nah, haven't you heard? Its the biggest scope most complex game of all time. Since the game is set in the future, people just act like robots then, it's all in the lore. Eye contact became a sin.
Are you claiming Sony doesn’t provide review copies to their fanboy websites?Receiving a review copy as either a pro-Xbox channel or an Xbox journalist should be an insult at this point because they know you're willing to kiss their ass.
I wonder if this is technically infringing on consumer rights somehow, intentionally trying to negate negative reviews, trying to make sure that the game receives an inflated review score, surely there are consumer watchdog committees out there that would think this is not fair.
Halo Infinite was extremely well received, it just didn’t get enough new content in time. The gameplay was some of the best in the series.I'm wondering if this is how Halo Infinite received so many great scores. Those high scores did not match the experience many players had once the game was released. It just seems like the kind of thing MS would gravitate towards - optics over quality, easy money over earning loyalty. If Starfield is not a good game or has the usual amount of Bethesda bugs on release, this could backfire quite badly for MS. That said, I know you and others are looking forward to it so I hope that's not the case.
Halo Infinite was extremely well received, it just didn’t get enough new content in time. The gameplay was some of the best in the series.
I'm sure Sony sends them to most regardless of what they rate games. I've only heard of one circumstance ever! Where Sony purposely didn't give a review copy and thst was after this site continuously trolled past games so it was good they didn't.Are you claiming Sony doesn’t provide review copies to their fanboy websites?
Halo Infinite was extremely well received, it just didn’t get enough new content in time. The gameplay was some of the best in the series.
I know this is a little console warrior, but damn, this is rough.
I wonder if this is technically infringing on consumer rights somehow, intentionally trying to negate negative reviews, trying to make sure that the game receives an inflated review score, surely there are consumer watchdog committees out there that would think this is not fair.
Are you claiming Sony doesn’t provide review copies to their fanboy websites?
How does UK being restricted (for whatever reason) equate to “something fishy” or “money hatting”? I’d understand if it was only given to Xbox fansites, but that’s not the case at all. It’s just UK.They are not required to provide review codes to anybody, so no.
Your whole persona is build around whataboutism. Sony, Nintendo, etc, provide reviews to fanboy websites. What they don't do is exclude a whole country minus those that are fanboy websites, or literally remove the biggest publications from getting a review code in a timely fashion.