Death Stranding and From Software games do it really well, the multiplayer elements enrich the single player experience.
If you’re a fan of action games, fighters, racing games, etc… it’s not much different than what you’ve been playing; just more of it and if done right numerous layers of depth and investment. I like getting a new Halo game every year from Bungie. I like not having to buy a full priced version of street fighter every 8 months for 4 new characters, balance updates and a unified player pool.
For many of these it’s just the evolution of the iterative sequel. Most have a multiplayer and PvP component.
Sports sims should make the jump but licensing costs are probably the big roadblock there and will continue to keep those as overpriced rehashes.
Single player gaas tho? Eh… depends. Not the way ass creed does it. Prefer what CDPR has done with Witcher 3. More organic I suppose. I’m sure Starfield is built entirely with such purpose… to grow for years.
I’d rather see something more like attempting to do the mass effect trilogy as one game episodically in some form in that case…
No vote.
I know Sony is pivoting into live service games and whatnot but as long as I average at least 2 single player blockbusters a year, im good.
An online Multiplayer game? MMO… Gaas.What’s EverQuest?
Mmos suck so idk what you're trying to say hereAn online Multiplayer game? MMO… Gaas.
Gaas is nothing new, its just a popular FUD word now
Exactly, I think we got the opposite indication, Live Service/GaaS to them means exactly what I feared, games without any creative drive build around monetization strategies (what pretty much ruined all multiplayers for me).I think if we got any indication that this was a major focus of the 'live service' content Sony wants to make, there'd be a lot less concern among certain enthusiasts and core of the fanbase.
That said when the first big initiatives are CGI trailers for Fairgame$ and Concord, that isn't a great sign stuff like DS and Souls-like (where there is a very strong single-player component you can enjoy and ignore the live-service stuff if you want) will be the focus.
Seems like those would fall under Sony's 'Traditional' categorization and budget funding for those is relatively flat year-to-year compared to the clear increases for live-service content.
MMOs got stuck in game design patterns from 25 years ago and only degenerated by absorbing terrible monetization and time wasting strategies from other more modern GaaS.Mmos suck so idk what you're trying to say here
They dont all suck. Its like saying 3rd person Action games suck because of Quantum Theory or countless others.Mmos suck so idk what you're trying to say here
That is what pisses me off so much about the story of Bungie having a say on ND game, I have no interest in Bungie like multiplayer while Factions was already damn good despite being a PS3 game (that they didn't even include on Part I). TLoU Part II has great gameplay and it was pretty much the only multiplayer game I was looking forward to (or to at least find out exactly what it is).
I find both Halo and Destiny extremely uninspiring and always did. If game was limited to games like this I would not be interested in playing games.
Sometimes its a great story and world that makes it interesting. If you like the more classic Final Fantasy’s, I say give Final Fantasy 14 a try. It surprised meMMOs got stuck in game design patterns from 25 years ago and only degenerated by absorbing terrible monetization and time wasting strategies from other more modern GaaS.
Love it
I know what EverQuest is… I just brought it up because like someone said. This isn’t the first time song has tried this.
Hell, I wish they didn’t try VR but people seem to be all for that. So …
It ain't for me, it doesn't get going, it's a massive time sink and it reminds me of post Vanilla WoW where there is absolutely no challenge and everything is instantiated and disconnected.Sometimes its a great story and world that makes it interesting. If you like the more classic Final Fantasy’s, I say give Final Fantasy 14 a try. It surprised me
They do all suck, by design. They need to be grindy to keep you invested or you stop paying the sub. Even ff14.They dont all suck. Its like saying 3rd person Action games suck because of Quantum Theory or countless others.
MMO’s or online RPG’s are pretty popular. Something Sony was making awhile ago
I really enjoyed Final Fantasy 14. It practically saved Square all of last gen despite its horrible launch
They also need to be dumbed down to the most braindead player, since everyone has to see all content and nobody is allowed to die while leveling apparently.They do all suck, by design. They need to be grindy to keep you invested or you stop paying the sub. Even ff14.
Not really. Endgames on the bigger mmos are notorious for being skill, level, and gear checks. But the point is the reason why you can only do a raid once a week, why it takes a dozen-20 people to do a raid, why each raid only drops an RNG piece of an RNG set and many drop systems only give one copy of that equipment per raid... it's to keep you stuck with your nose to the grindstone. You are trapped in the game like a full time job if you want to progress.They also need to be dumbed down to the most braindead player, since everyone has to see all content and nobody is allowed to die while leveling apparently.
This is exactly the mentality I mean, why would the game only become hard on the endgame?Not really. Endgames on the bigger mmos are notorious for being skill, level, and gear checks. But the point is the reason why you can only do a raid once a week, why it takes a dozen-20 people to do a raid, why each raid only drops an RNG piece of an RNG set and many drop systems only give one copy of that equipment per raid... it's to keep you stuck with your nose to the grindstone. You are trapped in the game like a full time job if you want to progress.
I'm with you on VR though I own a PSVR2. Just imagine how much more dedicated PS5 software we'd have now. I long for a PS generation where resources weren't split.
I know what EverQuest is… I just brought it up because like someone said. This isn’t the first time song has tried this.
Hell, I wish they didn’t try VR but people seem to be all for that. So …
Disagree tbh. Sony has enough resources to do both. It's like complaining that if Sony didn't make image sensors or music that we'd get more stuff for playstation.I'm with you on VR though I own a PSVR2. Just imagine how much more dedicated PS5 software we'd have now. I long for a PS generation where resources weren't split.
Okay? I never said they didn't? As they clearly do? I said I long for a generation where resources weren't split. No one is complaining here.Disagree tbh. Sony has enough resources to do both. It's like complaining that if Sony didn't make image sensors or music that we'd get more stuff for playstation.