I'm trying to see if there were any other cases of companies leaning heavily on public pressure as part of their strategy with regulators. Nvidia didn't seem to try that either with their ARM deal, though it seemed like that deal got even stronger pushback from regulators than this deal has so it probably wouldn't have mattered. Kinda hard to paint any sort of picture of historical trends with deals like this one atm, though apparently a resetera poster claims to have looked up 41 cases the cma looked at and they only accepted behavioral remedies as the sole solution in one case. (grain of salt)They didn’t.
Most corporations don’t conduct themselves in the embarrassing way that MS does, but then most corporations didn’t have a psychotic bully like Steve Ballmer at the top from day one to help toxify their corporate culture into basically being as close to a horde of rabid gorillas as humans can get, either!
Also, in the Nvidia ARM deal, it seems like they also made promises that they wouldn't block competitors from using the ARM chips and still weren't able to convince regulators, though that deal had some differences from this one.
Last edited: