That's a good one but sadly incomplete.This guy seems very neutral was tweeting live everything that was happening. Although he dipped out for a bit so some bits of the trial may not be in his tweets.
Thoughts typed as I read through:
- FTC accurately preempts the red herring claim that the issue is not simply about full foreclosure, while Beth Wilkinson seemed unprepared to counteract partial foreclosure claims in her opening statement.
- Microsoft shows legally privileged docs and seems to be banking on Jim Ryan's internal confidence boost statements to be a victory for them despite again not addressing partial foreclosure strategy MS could employ and without the context that it was written at a time predating the offers MS tried to push onto them - that Jim refused them later is a testament to their inadequacy and the irrelevance of his comments then to his stance now.
- Did Sarah Bond say COD will come to Nintendo for the first time or is the tweet author editorialising? She's either ignorant or lying and I hope she was called out for it.
- FTC laying the groundwork that the deals struck were opportunistic. Bundling in Xbox 1st party with ABK into the Nvidia etc. deals should count for nothing as they could have done this absent the acquisition.