No, but predatory pricing that's often subsidised by this kind of structure is. Predatory pricing would be offering something at a price your competitor could not do without sustaining losses, like 100s of titles including day one releases for $15 per month. The goal here is that once the competitor is driven out of business, they raise prices as the only game in town.Is using your amount earned from your largest earning division on a smaller division within the same megacorp to undermine and undercut the competition considered anti-competitive?