Hmm, interesting
This makes no sense, the game was announced as an exclusive in 2020
Bloodbath, MS's lawyer made the dude run in circles for like an hour, she's ruthless.Been at work since Jim’s video testimony ended.
Anyone kind enough to give a quick summary on how the ms and ftc economist did?
Would greatly appreciate it. Thanks
St-st-stutterin Sarah Bond at the top? I can dig that ranking.Bloodbath, MS's lawyer made the dude run in circles for like an hour, she's ruthless.
Jimbo did pretty ok, possibly one of the best suits of the Hearing with Sarah Bond, I'd argue so far that the worst witness was Dr. Robert Lee, and then Phil Spencer, but there's a chasm between them and a small hop between Phil,Pete Hines, Jimbo and Sarah
Jimbo did pretty ok, possibly one of the best suits of the Hearing with Sarah Bond
Hmm, interesting
Lol Millions to MS is like pennies.At least they got to fight for it and pay millions to lawyers and such to get it.
There definitely is a way. The CMA won't be able to hold once the FTC flubs out.Nah. CMA already killed the deal. There's no way around this.
That's why FFXVI is the MVP, that's why FFXVI is the GoaT! No other game could be seen as the answer to a $70B acquisition.I read the tweaktown twitter guy's summary and then the verge's and again, I honestly can't see what the doomsdaying is about. The FTC is making a case that Microsoft has incentive to foreclose, that Jim Ryan thought so, had Lee offer a plausible model, had him give an excellent breakdown of why even GP as a subscription service was a separate market by likening it to Netflix and B2O movies, and supported it with internal Microsoft documents corroborating they would pursue sub service exclusivity.
Meanwhile, bizarrely, again, we had Bonkers Beth Wilkinson go off on a tangent about Sony, this time about how they retaliated to the announcement of an acquisition by making...FFXVI exclusive? And their economist tried to suggest COD was not unique, but even Judge Coley called it a unicorn in gaming.
Edit: Sorry, I'm just shaking my head in disbelief here at the Beth Wilkinson thing. It's no wonder every Xbox shill is shitting up forums with "Sony, too!!!" when Microsoft's legal counsel thinks it's an appropriate defence to a regulator wanting to block you from an anticompetitive acquisition because of your history of anticompetitive behaviour.
Microsoft is like the snitch child in elementary. Pathetic.
This makes no sense, the game was announced as an exclusive in 2020
This makes no sense, the game was announced as an exclusive in 2020
it was announced as PS5 only, way before that. so this is just complete fallacy.Could they mean full exclusive