Reads like they're seething lol.Response from MS
Rumor
They really resent how much more successful Playstation has been compared to Xbox.MS still attacking Sony in their response, I'm so sick of them.
Of course, they are harming the customers on Sony platforms but the judge will side with Microsoft as usual.
And this is what I don't get. It's not like Sony stole it from them. They focused on new IPs during the PS3 era and grew to where they are today. None of their acquisition harmed MS. Even Insomniac that worked with MS had their game flop there.They really resent how much more successful Playstation has been compared to Xbox.
here goes Lead of Narrative in Fable
Same I just thought he posted what new backwards compatible games came out when they were doing backwards compatibility lol (used to have nightmares about the Cheshire cat from American McGee's Alice )I never understood his role in Xbox. He was in marketing?
Rumor
There goes Major Nelson
Saw him on reddit a few times promoting Xbox. Probably been recruiting and participating in Microsoft's astroturfing campaigns on various social media platformsWhat has he even been doing over the past decade? Literally. What was his job?
No one knows.What has he even been doing over the past decade? Literally. What was his job?
They can't grasp the difference between : ABK independent and both gettings games, to, ABK is owned by m$ and just xbox getting it. So, they can fuck off with that bullshit.Sony is their only fucking competitor in the console space for Activision games. So yes obviously the acquisition being harmful for their only competitor is anti-competitive and harmful to competition and consumers.
Why the fuck does that need to be spelled out?