I don't see it that way. I don't see the need to ban someone because they troll a game (regardless of platform). Aside from Nintendo, Sony and MS gamers go at it on each side. Some will even be sly about it ride a negative reviewers comments so they can troll on the sly. Bottomline is that trolling shouldn't be a bannable offense. And I agree with some people there saying that if it was some other game less high profile that this guy says "interactive movie", it would have went past without a fight. I remember the ridiculous trolling of Halo Infinite's vertical slice back on GAF. I got so sick and tired of the "Craig" memes. It was way too much and mods allowed it.
He wasn't banned for trolling GoW:R - he was given a warning about it. What got him banned was the post you linked. I don't know, I figure there could be a history there we don't know about. Thing is, don't you find it odd that someone would make the comment he did and then get mad at the mods for warning him about it? It was a comment that is provably wrong designed to dismiss a game he's never played or ever will play. You're right that some people are calling out the mods in the linked post - but very few of those are people I would describe as neutral in ye olde console wars. Sometimes I'm not sure if what we're seeing is harmless trolling, warring, or a complete lack of self-awareness but I don't see this bias you speak of. Guy said something dumb, got warned for it, decided the best course of action was to blame the mods, and got banned for it. That's what I see.
Last edited: