It’s not for gaming. And it’s not tethered. The display, processing power, sound, cameras, pass through, etc is generations beyond PSVR2.Every way possible, except no haptics, 2 hour battery life, no games, literally 7x more expensive. lmaoooo
It’s not for gaming. And it’s not tethered. The display, processing power, sound, cameras, pass through, etc is generations beyond PSVR2.Every way possible, except no haptics, 2 hour battery life, no games, literally 7x more expensive. lmaoooo
"really positive"Verge impressions, pretty damn positive.
I wore the Apple Vision Pro. It’s the best headset demo ever.
Apple’s new don’t-call-it-a-VR-headset is the best riff on some very familiar ideas, but still searching for a purpose.www.theverge.com
Apple has clearly solved a bunch of big hardware interaction problems with VR headsets, mostly by out-engineering and out-spending everyone else that’s tried. But it has emphatically not really answered the question of what these things are really for yet: the main interface is very much a grid of icons, and most of the demos were basically projections of giant screens with very familiar apps on them.
Was all this made better by the wildly superior Vision Pro hardware? Without question. But was it made more compelling? I don’t know, and I’m not sure I can know with just a short time wearing the headset. I do know that wearing this thing felt oddly lonely.
There are just more questions than answers here, and some of those questions get at the very nature of what it means for our lives to be literally mediated by screens.
That’s about how I feel about VR in general, though. this thing clearly is superior from a hardware perspective, as noted in the impressions. The rest will be up to the developers to create uses for it."really positive"
Sounds exactly like what it is. A product without a reason to exist.
Every way possible, except no haptics, 2 hour battery life, no games, literally 7x more expensive. lmaoooo
The only dramaticslly better thing here its your sad and miserable attempt to compare apples to oranges,cucoWell it’s dramatically better in every way possible than the PSVR2 obviously. I’m talking about a pricing standpoint. This is aimed at computing, while PSVR2 is aimed at gaming.
Some of them,yes but this is not a 400 bucks watch to wear on your handApple fans will still buy it
It’s not for gaming. And it’s not tethered. The display, processing power, sound, cameras, pass through, etc is generations beyond PSVR
Some of them,yes but this is not a 400 bucks watch to wear on your hand
Well it’s dramatically better in every way possible than the PSVR2 obviously. I’m talking about a pricing standpoint. This is aimed at computing, while PSVR2 is aimed at gaming.
Basically it's a niche product that sells for the price of two good gaming PCs (at least).Sounds exactly like what it is. A product without a reason to exist.
Nah its the new "thing" among xbots,praise to hell anything they percibe as a menace for the psvr2,you can see that shit on era tooAre you the typical apple evangelist that compares an iPhone that costs >1k with a phone that cost 100 quid and says "it's so much better, it proves apple is the best"? Because it seems like it.
Are you the typical apple evangelist that compares an iPhone that costs >1k with a phone that cost 100 quid and says "it's so much better, it proves apple is the best"? Because it seems like it.
What air tag is $200?These same people spent $200 on an Air tag, something that costs like $10 for everyone else