He was definitely trolling the fanboysRight, so I don't think he actually meant he wanted to talk about "SEINFELD" lol.
He was definitely trolling the fanboysRight, so I don't think he actually meant he wanted to talk about "SEINFELD" lol.
It is just metacritic score control.Nothing fishy here.
CAN PEOPLE STOP USING THAT GOD DAMN EXPRESSION AROUND HERE.Nothing fishy here.
By your estimation. what are the chances that @Kingthrash is getting a copy?It is just metacritic score control.
People are thinking "oh noes, they are afraid of the scorez", when what is going on here is the exact opposite.
The sites that are on hold are not only the biggest MS shills, they also have a large weight on the metacritic average. They are "waiting for their copy" while MS sees how the metacritic average evolves, so that they can later give that final push to boost the average up. The "didn't get our copy, woe is me" drama is just convenient clickbait to draw more attention to the inevitable 11/10s when they come.
DF are the exception, because they are needed to push their usual lies about performance and technical prowess.
LOL he might buy it.By your estimation. what are the chances that @Kingthrash is getting a copy?
Yes, that hurts the fish people's feelings!CAN PEOPLE STOP USING THAT GOD DAMN EXPRESSION AROUND HERE.
You have no sole.Yes, that hurts the fish people's feelings!
They need the views to get money so they can buy that pussy they would not get otherwise.So the thirsty, starved and hungry no pussy getting xbox phycopants stan mofuckers get review codes, but regular outlets dont?
Yeah thats a show of confidence
Remember when the push a few years ago was to not have any number ratings at all? Some sites stopped numbered reviews back then but recently went back to them. As If that was doing any justice to ppl interested in meta avgs.5 point scales are stupid. Wannabe movie critics
It's 2023, everything gets consolidated on to a 100 point scale on Metacritic which is the defacto reference point for reviews now
The thing is all these sites used to use 10 or 100 point scales and it worked fine
Movie reviewers are the ones who have traditionally used a 5 point scale, and it's fine there because it's a standard. In movies you know a 4 or 80 is really good. For gaming the 9 has been the signal of really good
I don't know why they even bother playing the game for their score, push them to Metacritic already :
Jez Corden - Windows Central
"The scale, the scope, nuff said"
10/10
Tom Warren - The Verge
"At first I was scared at all the scope, but thankfully they sprinkled in some scale too"
10/10
Stevivor
"A lot of simulated walking, but at least not a Sony walking simulator."
10/10
Takashi Mochizuki - Bloomberg
"Not available on a Sony device"
10/10
Colt Eastwood
"Mr Spencer was so nice to me"
10/10
Amen to that disgusting groomer apologistsEurogamer has not received a review code lmao.
Fuck Eurogamer.