40 Minutes Of Starfield Gameplay Have Leaked Online
- Thread starter John Elden Ring
- Start date
Where'd you read that? I know they're procedurally generated.I heard the environments/terrain are fully randomised. If you come back to a planet the terrain will have totally changed
Not like his though he sounds like a literal Karen I can hear him asking to talk to the manager
The planets except the main ones are procedurally generated which is obvious because they were never going to 'hand craft' 1000 planetsI heard the environments/terrain are fully randomised. If you come back to a planet the terrain will have totally changed
would make sense because knowing bethesda fully storing each location in storage would make 1000 planets larger than the SSD size of the Series X
You can make a procedural landscape and pass in a seed value in the RNG that will repeat so not sure why they wouldn't use that. Each gamer will get a different seed so that would make it random for each person but that seed value would be stored on each person's machine so going back will give the same terrain.
For shits and giggles, from what you've seen, what makes it a failure?
Not defensive at all.. just don't like concern trolling.the fact your so defensive of this game that you haven't played shows that you just want to dickride Bethesda / Xbox
Depends on how long it takes to generate it, but yeah that could work. Could also be the reason they need load screens in between
If that's the bar being set for this game, then it has already failed. You guys have got to keep in mind, Starfield is supposed to represent a turning point in Microsoft's 1P output, outside of their traditional staple. It's also, by incident, meant to be a redemption for the absolute disaster that was RedFall months earlier.
"Just" getting beyond Cyberpunk is not good enough. It shouldn't be good enough. When are people going to start demanding Microsoft put out some genuinely industry-leading, standard-setting 1P AAA epics? They want the allure of competing with Sony on power but want to skirt doing so where it actually matters: in 1P software that pushes the limits of the hardware's technical capabilities. That's half-assing it IMHO.
We already know games journalists are going to over-score this game just to give a narrative power, similar to what they did with Halo Infinite. The hope should be that unlike that game, Starfield is legitimately representative of its score or close to it. With how biased and corrupted games outlets are these days (particularly in the West), though, that's hard to believe will happen.
Am I saying Starfield needs to be Game of the Generation? Of course not. But it needs to be doing at least something beyond other open-world games on the market, especially considering the size of the company funding it and what resources they have available to them. Unfortunately for the game, each new leaked footage we see keeps revealing a game that's, at best, on-par with most of the other standard open-world games already on the market, and not even in all aspects. At worst, some of the footage is already showing it to be under-par in some aspects compared to those other games.
My opinion: going off what's been shown it looks like a solid 85 MC game. And I hate MetaCritic, but it's the quickest way to convey where I feel it lands quality-wise. Depending on how present the less-than-flattering aspects of the game take up play time, I think a realistic high-end is a 90, but anything over that will feel like reviewers just gaming the system to prop it up for a narrative neither it nor Microsoft deserve to have.
Nice to see we have a resident Starfield damage controller (TM). I’m sure Microsoft has a few of them in most message boards at the present.
I don’t know what will happen if non biased MS media like IGN, Eurogamer etc. submitting their review and Starfield ends up scoring like 78 Metacritic. Because the recent reports I read didn’t sound promising. And putting in mind that MS set the review embargo one day before official release sounds suspicious.
Edit: looooooooool
Edit: looooooooool
Last edited:
Well that planet doesn't look boring at all (I realise planets are like that but it's a game fgs it's supposed to be fun
)
all of a sudden the leaks that the devs were "struggling to find the fun" in starfield make 100% sense
So more and more dicey things shown up lately…
What’s your final MC score prediction?
I say 78-82
What’s your final MC score prediction?
I say 78-82