This is my new favorite GIF, and you are my new favorite person.Them entering this thread:
This is my new favorite GIF, and you are my new favorite person.Them entering this thread:
Who cares anymore, point being this is all wrong. Aaron retweeted this back in April which undoubtedly means Ampere is wrong and VGChartz is actually accurate.@DynamiteCop and @Bernd Lauert - Present evidence for your claims, talk to your peers with respect ("clown game" remarks, etc..) and argue gracefully - OR leave the thread. We are tired of having to tell you guys how to argue in good faith.
That five year backlog you have must be full of classics. Ooh let's see what's next, Powerwash Simulator and Hot Wheels, with Deathloop to comeI see you're working towards your second permaban. Keep up the good work
Yes because we know from the data that there are lot of people subbing to GamePass to play on their tablets and phones, not to mention PC GamePass is a roaring success. Console sales don't really matter to MSOutside of titles Sony pays to keep of Xbox this doesn't seem very likely. The biggest game in the world is CoD and I'm thinking all of Sony's money won't be able to keep that title off Xbox going forward. These sales numbers will have no appreciable affect on the Xbox platform whatsoever. Sony needs to sell consoles far more than MS does so it is good they are doing well. Both platforms will be fine.
The most funny think it to check VGC in some weeks to see the numbers being ajustes to match the data Ampere showed.Never thought I'd live to see VGChartz heralded as the most accurate source for tracking sales figures.
ROFLMAO
Well we're in weird times but it is what it is.Never thought I'd live to see VGChartz heralded as the most accurate source for tracking sales figures.
ROFLMAO
Fake data has no place here even if it makes you happy lolWell we're in weird times but it is what it is.
Fake data lmao? It's an employee confirmation. Don't be sour.Fake data has no place here even if it makes you happy lol
Who cares anymore, point being this is all wrong. Aaron retweeted this back in April which undoubtedly means Ampere is wrong and VGChartz is actually accurate.
13.87 million in APRIL, so that 16.4 million figure is the actual representation of the Series consoles.
Fake news, the Xbox 360 was already at 15+ million at this point and recently Satya Nadella said the Series consoles had outstripped even it as their fastest selling consoles.
This is low ball fiction bullshit.
@DynamiteCop That's wrong. By this time, month 20th, Xbox 360 had only sold 10.40 million units, not 15+ million. It hit 15 million units in month #26 -- half a year later.
13.8 million units for Xbox X|S puts it ahead of Xbox 360 and doesn't negate what Nadella said (who, btw, was only talking about the North American market anyway).
Lmao so you discredit VGChartz on one hand and then try to use them as a basis of argument on the other. You're done.
It's a clown game, I can't stand these people.
You might as well just do it at this point cuz this place is becoming Nazi Germany and you have like five people registered here. Good luck.
This doesn't invalidate a senior employee citing their numbers this time around as accurate though. Cute logical fallacy though.
Yeah, I never once trusted that 15+ million figure. VGChartz has this number on almost 17 million, which just doesn't make sense at all. Or the alternative (assuming both VGChartz and Ampere Analysis are correct) means that there are almost 3 million Xbox X|S units sitting in the stores with no one willing to buy them.
He got the Gamepass number from Microsoft. We're talking about XBLG. And no, compared to your "0" number, he was not overestimating.
I think so, yes. Other analysts have the number quite a bit higher. And before you try for another desperate gotcha, I'm not talking about VGChartz
Here you go. Another source. @Bernd Lauert @DynamiteCop . Look at the top. "Based on official financial reports."
I'll wait for the apology @DynamiteCop Also, now you should either accept your mistake or present your source for that 15 million number you threw with no data to backup.
I don't have a good memory, so excuse me if I'm wrong. But I think the article that you're referring to was from a third-party "gaming news" website. The writer took two different sets of data (one of which came from Ampere) and made weird assumptions that inflated Gamepass's revenue numbers and market share.Hope you're not talking about Zhuge then, that dude's made some embarrassing, practically fanboy-esque post(s) in light of the announced PS5 price increase on Twitter.
And Welfare AFAIK doesn't have sales industry connections or anywhere near low-level data access the likes of Piers or Ampere would (Zhuge either for that matter, tho they're in-between a Welfare and Piers/Ampere in that regard).
Only thing I can hold against Ampere were the GamePass numbers, mainly because they had two sets of data with two different graphs of measure but the article itself didn't differentiate between the two (and if anything, made the GamePass percentages look better. In fact I think the recent quote from Sony on GamePass's percentage of the subscriptions market is from that Ampere article xD).
What a clown, this is why Xbox execs are an embarrassment.
Vivid imagination you have there, read the tweet you posted, it validates nothing.This doesn't invalidate a senior employee citing their numbers this time around as accurate though. Cute logical fallacy though.
The fact that he posted it validates it lmao. We're not having a debate here.Vivid imagination you have there, read the tweet you posted, it validates nothing.
Cute try but..