They must not have been able to pitch a 2nd project to continue the studio. Oh well, that's what you get for chasing the live services. At least they nipped it in the bud before it could suck.
Probably what happened has been that when it was reviewed, Sony asked to change/improve some huge parts, highly delaying it. So to compensate the budget fired a portion of people, who wouldn't be needed for maybe a year or two or were in charge of that part that wouldn't have been good enough.
And then today/this week, half a year later they had another milestone and again missed it. So Sony would have cancelled the project, or if lucky moved it to the new SIE team with ex-Deviation members.
Devinetively something weird happened in the studio because it's rare to see the head of the studio leaving and later leading a different studio for the same publisher. Which leads to think Sony and him didn't have any issue, but was instead an issue between him and the studio and Sony was on his side.
He is like Tatsumi Kimishima. A man who is conservative and modest. He follows a clear path and knows to plan ahead.
Yes Totoki is only for a year the CEO of PlayStation but in the meantime he will appoint the fitting candidate. This time it will be a Japanese to be appointed as such. Neither Eric Lempel nor anyone from SIE America/Europe is benefiting for this position. With the aid of recent decisions and statements you can clearly see that Sony’s execs are tired of Hollywood blockbuster madness. Irresponsible budgets and political messages are enough. This time I guarantee you it will be someone Japanese to be next PlayStation CEO. My bet is Kiichiro Urata which also has for a fun fact, the highest position after CEO: Company Director of SIE. He will very likely takeover.
Totoki isn't supposed to be CEO for a year. He will be interim CEO since April 1st until the next CEO starts, which could be the week later.
Under the SIE CEO there are several senior vicepresidents, these ones:
https://sonyinteractive.com/en/our-company/
Notice there's no Kiichiro Urata mentioned there in their leadership list.
I'd say Eric Lempel and Lin Tao may be the ones with more chances. Probably Eric because of being specially successful and because of having a longer relationship with SIE/PS.
Urata instead is "SVP, Head of Japan Asia Partner Development & Relations / member of the Board of Directors". Before he was CEO of Capcom USA & Europe subsidiaries (not Capcom) during 10 years (2011-2021), when these subsidiaries did suck (and still do). Before that he did work at Microsoft as "Corporate Officer, Interactive Entertainment Business & Strategy" since 2022 to 2011. I highly doubt they'd put someone as CEO who has only been 3 years in the company and before that was CEO of subsidiaries that did suck, plus on top of that could be a MS "secret agent spy".
Regarding budgets, they'll continue making AAA games with huge budgets. Good luck if you think Sony is now going to make indies or AA. They just shutted down some projects because needed to cut some fat and pretty likely saw they weren't good enough, as usual in any gaming company. Normal business. The strategy continues being the same.
What are some key points of Totoki action though? Any insights? Also, isn't he only a temporary CEO?
Totoki isn't the CEO, he's the chairman. March 31 Jim Ryan will retire, and April 1st Totoki will become interim CEO. Meaning, he'll be temporally CEO until the next proper CEO starts to work. So maybe during a week, a month or who knows.
Interim CEOs normally don't take any meaningful decision other than to handle the transition from a CEO to the next one. Only maybe if there is something very important that can't wait until the next CEO starts to work in that position.
At least we got Helldivers from the GAAS push but overall.... hasn't really been a good thing.
They also have MLB, GT7, Destiny 2 and Firewall Ultra. Plus the ones to be released.
Their game was cancelled and the studio placed in extreme jeopardy almost a full year ago.
No, the game has been cancelled (or moved to other team) now. A studio can't have around 100 AAA game devs in LA during almost a year doing nothing and not getting paid.