Actually kinda bet he was pushed out/encouraged to retire
Actually kinda bet he was pushed out/encouraged to retire
Bring back Japan Studios. And the smaller games of early PS4 and before
Nothing will change. He isn't the only one who's making decisions at Sony.Fuck, he needs to stay through this gaas initiative, PlayStation needs great multiplayer games again. Hopefully another European replaces him, or a Japanese exec but please God no more Americans.
If this is the case. something must be fucked up.Actually kinda bet he was pushed out/encouraged to retire
Firesprite is actually PS liverpool, that studio got canned years ago, formerly known as Pygyonsis I think.To some of the folk shitting on Jim, dont forget if it wasnt for him, identifying partners PS worked well with in the past they may not be first party right now if it were other leadership. Housemarque, Bluepoint, Insomniac, Bungie (not crazy about this one) but all significant additions IMO. I also think firesprite will be a future ACE card to play, we will have to see. Haven studios?... hmm jury is still out on them but i hope they will turn out great.
Because although Ryan may have had an impsct in his earlier roles Kaz was the one to turn the whole of Sony around late PS3/PS4 era. Because of him PlayStation became the face of Sony.I don't think people give him enough credit for how innovative the PS5 is, and helped make PlayStation bigger than it ever was, even after a global pandemic.
To a retirement well deserved.
30 years for the same company is a heck of a career, and he tops it off by being on top.
The next CEO will be in charge of the PS6, I hope we have someone with real vision.
>ps+ subs stalledIf this is the case. something must be fucked up.
And those are not the real fundamental flaws of his vision and administration. But yes, the investor class will hang him for sub performance. Which is why you don't make your vision and pitch on console about sub performance metrics when you do not benefit from an industry shift going the sub way. Sony already "owns" the industry as-is under the traditional model. It's the other competitors trying to disrupt Sony's reign through a sub pitch who stand to gain the most from the sub shift.... thus the more you engage in subs, the more you legitimize the competitors pitch. I think for the most part Sony has stroke a balance (online paywall not included) but even that is enough for that metric to be used as tool against you. Btw, the competitors all gun hoe in their dream of pushing an industry shift to subs are failing, to huge costs to them, regardless of how they hide the fixed cost numbers of their expenses.>ps+ subs stalled
>not his fault but lost abk
>pc ports flopping
>1st party pipeline outside of insomniac, ND internally rebooting factions at least twice
>closing japan studio
>psvr2 semi-flop
>square enix running to xbox
>kojima running to xbox
>embarassing PR blunders thanks to jim e.g. $10 upgrade fee fiasco
There's plenty for him to be nitpicked over.
I think from a business perspective the gaas pivot might be defensible, as much as core gamers dislike it. Just depends on how badly they monetize it. There are good gaas games like deep rock galactic (free battle pass, rewards go in loot pool for playing the game after season expires so there's no fomo, free expansion dlc, only monetization is separate cosmetic packs to support the devs and they're entire packs instead of individual pieces), and there are bad ones like destiny (deleting paid content, forced fomo, paid expansions+extra mtx on everything, fomo, underdeliver on everything)And those are not the real fundamental flaws of his vision and administration.
I'd give him until sometime tomorrow saying he congratulates him on his long years of service and wishes him the best in his future endeavors or retirement for the good guy Phil P.R.How long before bad breath Phil tweets about Jim's retirement