Jim going to PC is not an awful decision to a PCMR fan that wants the PC ecosystem to be the one-stop shop of every publisher in existance. Purely self-interest. Everything that is said around that is noise and cover. To the PCMR they gain something which before they did not have as a result of those decisions - Sony's top of the line exclusive software. Thus, championing those decisions is the "right" thing to do from their pov.
Consoles can burn for all they care (that is where the idiocy comes in - way too shortsighted). That sort of thinking comes about due to a fundamental misunderstanding of the premium games market as well as a lack of depth in analysis. Consoles are the premium games industry and what drives the premium games industry, not PC. There is a reason why Microsoft, the main stakeholder of the PC ecosystem, who built a monopoly on it, decided to build a console themselves, and not double down in championing PC in a battle lost long ago, where consoles became the dominant industry driver. Instead, MS with its Xbox consoles help the PC platform from the inside so the market can be shared with PC by extension, as opposed to being shut out, in effective terms, if Sony were to have continued on its dominance path past the PS2. PC is not a suitable substitute for consoles, and the industry can not stand on its pillars. Thus, it's in every gamers interest that consoles are vibrant, healthy, differentiated and competitive. Every gamer also includes those on PC that have similar consumption patterns to those of console users. Obviously that's too deep of an analysis for your average Joe that is just interested in having all the toys for himself and sees a zero sum game. It's a fundamental difference in analysis and approach, with the console paradigm being: "exclusives matter" - which means, every garden must have its differentiated exclusive content and thus not everyone gets to have all the toys, and that is fine, and healthy. It should not surprise that the company that is pushing hard to disrupt this market, through a transition to the cloud, subscription rental services, and the opening of the gardens is the one that enjoys a monopoly on PC and is accustomed to monopolistic thinking - Microsoft. It's unfortunate when a major console stakeholder such as Sony follows a path to ruin and self-destruction laid by MS, who operates on a completely different realm, motivated by different visions, one that includes them as a monopoly of the premium games market, through the cloud, and PC, with consoles being just a blip, if at all. That Microsoft fails in their overall aim does not mean they don't leave their print and mark behind, shaping the market by doing so and thus, only partial failure.