Microsoft's acquisition of Activison Blizzard
- Thread starter Darth Vader
- Start date
D
Deleted member 417
Guest
More deals with cloud companies which means more people and more players relying on Microsoft azure.
It's as if, that was the plan all along. If only Spencer would have said something along the lines of "Sony aren't our competitors, amazon and Google are", then none of this would be surprising.
CoD is the trojan horse, not the ABK deal. Microsoft can separate it from AbK as long as they can host the servers for the game.
It's as if, that was the plan all along. If only Spencer would have said something along the lines of "Sony aren't our competitors, amazon and Google are", then none of this would be surprising.
CoD is the trojan horse, not the ABK deal. Microsoft can separate it from AbK as long as they can host the servers for the game.
OP
OP
"yes same day same place" "They should know we respect confidentiality"
View attachment 815
View attachment 817
Same day, same place, but outside a confidential environment? Sure. I wouldn't be surprised if the only reason Sony is not suing the shit out of her is because that would paint them in a very bad light.
"We respect confidentiality " Yet they turn these proceedings into a public sideshow."yes same day same place" "They should know we respect confidentiality"
View attachment 815
View attachment 817
I can’t say it once again: Microsoft is a scumbag company. What they have demanded from Sony, they are now hiding.
Microsoft opened up Pandora's Box, now cough up the goods you fucking hypocrites.
The greasy rats at microsoft and activision are both scumbag companies that deserve to be found dead in a ditch together.
Couldn't they get those details from the people who received those offers as well?
Also, nothing the FTC are asking for seems unreasonable.
OP
OP
I would really recommend checking this whole thread. The FTC is going hard on them, and I fully believe they will be sharing this with the CMA and EC (as they are almost powerless to block this deal, and can only delay it).
OP
OP
No. Those people are not part of the process (unless they are registered as witnesses or defendants). Microsoft are the ones that must provide documentation to back their case.
I see. It seems like if the contracts had no issues MS would have no problems sending them to the FTC. They don't seem to mind giving them to everyone else, lol.
Curious to see if the judge makes them cough it up the same way they did for Sony.
OP
OP
Nah, they would not want to release them because it's their best interest. It's standard corporate practice. What seems more interesting is their sandbagging by providing some but flat out refusing to provide others. That's what to me gives it away that those contracts don't paint them in a great light.
Third parties who are not a party to the lawsuit can be subpoened, this has already happened to Sony.
OP
OP
Isn't Sony listed as one of the complainants though? But yeah, weren't there several subpoenas going around earlier on?