D
Deleted member 417
Guest
I can understand the viewpoint that it isn't about profit, though I don't entirely agree. I do disagree with Microsoft keeping games in their ecosystem.Given recent history and MS’ longstanding business practices, you’re really making quite the ass of yourself by insisting MS won’t do EXACTLY WHAT THEY HAVE ALREADY DONE.
Yes, it makes no business sense to make Starfield, or COD, or anything that was multiplatform exclusive to Xbox, but that’s only if you care about making money.
Microsoft has run XBox at a huge financial loss for all but two non-consecutive quarters of its existence. They don’t care about profitability, they just want to hurt other companies in the industry, and they make enough elsewhere to absorb the loss. That is actually anticompetitive and monopolistic business practice.
Don’t be naive, anything MS buys is going to be locked into their ecosystem, sense and profit be damned.
They want to expand Gamepass to as many people as possible, get it on as many devices as possible. If they can't get gamepass on a device, the second best option is to use said device to drive people to Gamepass. Going multi plat with games does just that.
Likewise, there is no benefit to be gained for Microsoft by keeping games exclusive beyond 6/12 months after launch. We saw this during the ps360 generation. Microsoft even crow about "Timed Exclusive!" on their E3 sizzle reels.
They don’t care about profitability, they just want to hurt other companies in the industry, and they make enough elsewhere to absorb the loss
I believe it will be 'play it first, play it free on gamepass', then it will come to Playstation. That way they hurt the industry,own the industry and make enough from other platforms to absorb the loss