Doubt it as there's nothing on GAF's and Restera's front page.So was there anything notable from Jim's testimony? Anything the usual suspects will try to weaponize?
Doubt it as there's nothing on GAF's and Restera's front page.So was there anything notable from Jim's testimony? Anything the usual suspects will try to weaponize?
‘I don't like to comment about the ABK deal’ What a load of crap... Just say you don’t want to bite the hand that feeds.
Also, this is the FTC vs MS. Sony doesn't have to prove anything.
Well all this arguments they been making for the past year and a half was for nothing then. Sony should have kept silent, and worked on T2 while MS was occupied with this. Now they in a position where their next acquisition because of their testimony and all the sealed and unsealed doc from this is just gonna make regulators give both them and MS a hard time on the next acquisition. Nintendo was smart staying out of this shit, they kept all their secrets and have Sony on record saying nintendo is not competition.It's probably because it will bite him in the ass in the future and in the cross examination.
Doesn't matter. The deal is dead as is any future change of MS acquiring any big publisher.Well all this arguments they been making for the past year and a half was for nothing then. Sony should have kept silent, and worked on T2 while MS was occupied with this. Now they in a position where their next acquisition because of their testimony and all the sealed and unsealed doc from this is just gonna make regulators give both them and MS a hard time on the next acquisition. Nintendo was smart staying out of this shit, they kept all their secrets and have Sony on record saying nintendo is not competition.
You can't allow MS to buy Bethesda and remove their games from PlayStation and stop Sony (or Nintendo) from doing the same.Also, Sony shouldn't be allowed to buy any big publisher.
‘I don't like to comment about the ABK deal’ What a load of crap... Just say you don’t want to bite the hand that feeds.
Also, this is the FTC vs MS. Sony doesn't have to prove anything.
Because MS has ran their Xbox business at a loss for years, is buying up PlayStation main third-party partners and directly benefits from being a major player in the general cloud market already (even approached Sony in the past to partner with them on Cloud while internally they were talking about spending them out of business).Xbox will probably win this court case because they’ve successfully made this a Xbox vs Sony thing instead of FTC making this about trillion dollar MS monopoly on cloud. I’ve yet to hear Jim explain how Sony can’t compete with Microsoft’s competitive advantage in cloud
I think that will really fall on the FTC really. Jims only really been brought on to be cross examined and will only really answer what they ask him.I’ve yet to hear Jim explain how Sony can’t compete with Microsoft’s competitive advantage in cloud
It's already dead. It's all smokes and mirrors at this point.Microsoft doesn’t have to do anything at this point and Microsoft keeps winning.
Until the deal is killed ultimately by the CMA.
Xbox will probably win this court case because they’ve successfully made this a Xbox vs Sony thing instead of FTC making this about trillion dollar MS monopoly on cloud. I’ve yet to hear Jim explain how Sony can’t compete with Microsoft’s competitive advantage in cloud
Only by sound, not really.What did you guys think of the FTC economist? Did the two models make sense to anyone?