Microsoft's acquisition of Activison Blizzard

Swolf712

Veteran
29 Jun 2022
781
1,018
Wisconsin, USA
I think a big part of the problem with MS is they think of people as exploitable wallets. And that money is rightfully theirs to take. If they can't persuade you to give it to them (eg. Game Pass), they'll compel you to (buy up the most popular IPs and make them exclusive). This has been the attitude I've seen from MS ever since the XBox one reveal. Of course, it would be lovely if they saw people as customers who they need to earn loyalty and money from. Like, for example, consistently release great games to draw people to your platform. That's not happening, though, and we now have a really good look as to why with all the information from the FTC trial.

When I look at XBox fans like our own @Exanthus who is a cool cat that prefers the XBox platform, I genuinely want MS to just cut the bullshit and do better. But when I look at people like the one you are replying to - I realize they have no need to. There are people, some paid and some not, who will never expect or demand any standards from MS.
If you read Bill Gates' letters and emails back when he was running Microsoft, it's like he read every single negative stereotype and claim about Capitalism as if it were an instruction book. And that's not a joke. 😅
 

Gods&Monsters

Veteran
21 Jun 2022
5,579
11,385
View attachment 1772

Seems like FTC may have some options according to the article.
The Meta-Within judge took 6 weeks to rule and that was a very small case.

If the judge rushes to give her final decision before July 12, she basically gives Microsoft the go ahead to close the deal before the deadline without the FTC. It will show the world she was on their side all along and how corrupted she is.

 

FatKaz

Veteran
16 Jul 2022
2,256
4,252
The Meta-Within judge took 6 weeks to rule and that was a very small case.

If the judge rushes to give her final decision before July 12, she basically gives Microsoft the go ahead to close the deal before the deadline without the FTC. It will show the world she was on their side all along and how corrupted she is.

Complexity of the case combined with her idiocy that won't be resolved in a few weeks, I don't know how she can make a reasonable judgment in a short time.

The sane thing to do is grant the PI and let this go through the full court proceedings. I mean people can also argue well she can't reasonably grant the PI in the short amount of time either, but it's the sanest option.

And if the case reaches a federal judge again and it's the same judge, then she could use the time to wise up.

What concerning is, this judge was not corrected on alot of her really bad takes during the hearing, so this judge will be assessing the evidence and arguements with her really shit takes.
 

Cool hand luke

Veteran
14 Feb 2023
2,931
5,199
Complexity of the case combined with her idiocy that won't be resolved in a few weeks, I don't know how she can make a reasonable judgment in a short time.

The sane thing to do is grant the PI and let this go through the full court proceedings. I mean people can also argue well she can't reasonably grant the PI in the short amount of time either, but it's the sanest option.

And if the case reaches a federal judge again and it's the same judge, then she could use the time to wise up.

What concerning is, this judge was not corrected on alot of her really bad takes during the hearing, so this judge will be assessing the evidence and arguements with her really shit takes.
Yeah. If you want an example of uninformed and out of touch, look no further than her comment about how everyone has a gaming PC. 🙄
 

FatKaz

Veteran
16 Jul 2022
2,256
4,252
View attachment 1772

Seems like FTC may have some options according to the article.
It will be interesting if the FTC do appeal how it plays out. If they do appeal i'd think the judge would have to maybe extend the temporary injunction just incase as the decision would not be final after an appeal? So it'd probaly go over the expiry date anyway, gamers lawsuit is still going after weeks after an appeal.

Considering there is a high chance of this going over the expiry date, there is no reason for the judge to fall for the MS/ABK sympathy card of "if you grant his injunction the deal dies". They will have to renogotaite anyway if the FTC appeals alongside the CAT appeal, if the FTC are't spineless and have good grounds then they should appeal.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Arminius

ksdixon

Dixon Cider Ltd.
22 Jun 2022
1,877
1,209

There's only so many VR headsets out there.
I think Facebook's Occlus/Quest, PSVR and Valve has their own one too right? How can FB gobbling up a 4th upstart not directly negatively affect Sony and Valve?
 

ksdixon

Dixon Cider Ltd.
22 Jun 2022
1,877
1,209
Perhaps I misunderstood it, but surely Bobby requesting in mid-injunction hearing to negotiate with Sony about COD in case they lost the merger attempt must have been seen as a negative blow? Im imagining MS' lawyers leaving courtroom muttering "wtf is he doing? We're literally trying to buy his company, and he's trying to set himself up a fallback plan..."
 

ultimateFF

Veteran
29 Jun 2023
525
595
Perhaps I misunderstood it, but surely Bobby requesting in mid-injunction hearing to negotiate with Sony about COD in case they lost the merger attempt must have been seen as a negative blow? Im imagining MS' lawyers leaving courtroom muttering "wtf is he doing? We're literally trying to buy his company, and he's trying to set himself up a fallback plan..."
That's what you get for dealing with the devil(Kotick), MS LMAO 😂
 
  • party
Reactions: Bryank75

Nhomnhom

Banned
25 Mar 2023
8,414
11,558
The FTC has a great case to appeal if they lose, the judge's son works for MS yet she chose not to recuse herself. If they are able to slow the process down they should win by default since Bobby did not seem too interested in giving MS more time.
 

reziel

Banned
12 Jun 2023
743
622
The FTC has a great case to appeal if they lose, the judge's son works for MS yet she chose not to recuse herself. If they are able to slow the process down they should win by default since Bobby did not seem too interested in giving MS more time.
The FTC can't use the son as an excuse before it started they were asked if they had an issue with her being in charge of the case knowing her son worked for MS. They screwed themselves out of that excuse. However there is a law saying she should have recused herself since it could pose a bias toward one side but I don't believe that takes effect considering the FTC agreed to this situation.