Don't even know what that means? Saying Xbox will die is delusion. Nothing more, nothing less. It's okay if you hate Xbox, but delusional takes are silly.We got an astroturfer here?
Don't even know what that means? Saying Xbox will die is delusion. Nothing more, nothing less. It's okay if you hate Xbox, but delusional takes are silly.We got an astroturfer here?
@KingOfTheDead so it was an option presented to them, it was referred to in the final report, and MS said they'd never do anyyhing structural.
You're not showing me anything. CMA never offered MS to divest Cod so the deal will pass. If I'm wrong, please prove me wrong. In the final report it was never mentioned of being offered. . Bobby has also said it was never offered.
How about you stop being pretentious alreadyDon't even know what that means? Saying Xbox will die is delusion. Nothing more, nothing less. It's okay if you hate Xbox, but delusional takes are silly.
Show me in the final report. If you find it, I will concede.@KingOfTheDead so it was an option presented to them, it was referred to in the final report, and MS said they'd never do anyyhing structural.
You're wrong on all counts and if Microsoft does divest then they'll be capitulating.
What mask? Everybody knows who Welfare is.What a crybaby cuck. I'm glad your mask came off, and I hope your forum is investigated for whatever illegal degeneracy it's bred in your rotten members and mods.
No wonder you've just whirred to life after the latest news. You've been an Xbot all along, falsely inflating their sales at every turn.
Xbox will be dead if the CMA maintains the block, that's the only certainty.
In the final draft, the CMA proposed prohibition as a remedy.Show me in the final report. If you find it, I will concede.
We have decided that prohibition of the Merger would be an effectiveand proportionate remedy to address the SLC in the market for cloud gamingservices in the UK and its resulting adverse effects.
Doesnt really matter if they appeal. The deal can go ahead. They would need an emergency order to block the deal. If the CMA and MS work things outs which is very likely, this saga is over. Time to move on.What's even more hilarous is folks where calling the FTC weak, yes they lost the PI but they continue to fight. Even though they haven't appealed the PI decison yet, they made a comment they are still going to fight this in august.
While every other regulator has folded. Obviously remains to be seen what the CMA do. MS already rejected the much stronger divestiture remedy, so having that discussion with them isn't going to go anywhere.
One thing is for sure is if the CMA accept some weak divestiture, they better be ready to accept that for other companies. That includes sony if they make a big acquisition and CMA ask for divestiture.
He has pretended to be a neutral and a sony fan in the past, when all his actions belie that intent. Yes, everyone could tell it was an act. But he's never come out and outright stated it (hence his mask fell) until today.What mask? Everybody knows who Welfare is.
If you are a ms customer……..Brace yourselves for decades of dull, mediocre products.
I know right. Don't let these things get to your head.Bro relax
Pretty much.So anything is on the table now if this gets finalised. Big, small, sector altering or not.
Ryan better be having meetings on building a war chest to stave off what’s to come
Disingenuous. Nothing has changed with regards to the CMA's position. Their statement is practically "we are your last remaining obstacle, give us the changes we want and you can have your merger, if not, no." Nothing has changed the CMA's rationale, nothing has changed the conditions that embody their findings. They blocked this before the FTC did, so changes to FTC's case have little impact on their decision to block it.What really surprised me is the CMA going back to the table to work it out with MS. I thought for sure they would remain unmoveable and would force MS to go to the CAT. The PI being denied was widely expected in most places.
Disagree. If the CMA was going to sit on its position it would have let the CAT litigation play out.Disingenuous. Nothing has changed with regards to the CMA's position. Their statement is practically "we are your last remaining obstacle, give us the changes we want and you can have your merger, if not, no." Nothing has changed the CMA's rationale, nothing has changed the conditions that embody their findings. They blocked this before the FTC did, so changes to FTC's case have little impact on their decision to block it.
There is going to be pressure on them to approve it. A statement like this is PR.Disagree. If the CMA was going to sit on its position it would have let the CAT litigation play out.