Well it's all but confirmed that it's coming to Playstation. Shuhei Yoshida has been responding on his Twitter to people posting about it so they're definitely looking into it. Looks like the box had its run unless they lock it down.
Last edited:
Chances of a lawsuit are considerably lower then. Sony isn't going to rush this forward if the claims against the game are substantial since it opens them up.Well it's all but confirmed that it's coming to Playstation. Shuhei Yoshida has been responding on his Twitter to people posting about it so they're definitely looking into it. Looks like the box had its run unless they lock it down.
Well, data miners have found text from Pokèmon games in the PC build’s files, so expect a lawsuit, no matter who wants the game on what platform.Chances of a lawsuit are considerably lower then. Sony isn't going to rush this forward if the claims against the game are substantial since it opens them up.
Lol "text". Where's the source?Well, data miners have found text from Pokèmon games in the PC build’s files, so expect a lawsuit, no matter who wants the game on what platform.
Lol "text". Where's the source?
I'll believe in such a lawsuit when I see it. Nintendo is able to action a lawsuit against a mod in a few hours but despite it being presumably obvious to everyone that assets and lines of Pokemon material are in the game - crickets.Well, data miners have found text from Pokèmon games in the PC build’s files, so expect a lawsuit, no matter who wants the game on what platform.
Time to abandon Lethal Company for a new fad.Is this another fad that some youtuber picked up and now everyone pretends they like so they can be "in"?
I think a lot of the plagiarism people will be eating their hat soon enough. These models are not "almost 1:1" as has been argued. Reading the Era comments on this are really funny. ResetEra Admin beginning the cope "I also want to remind people: You can commit plagiarism without actually being civilly or criminally liable for it. If Nintendo decides not to sue, or even if they try it and lose for whatever reason in Japanese court, that would not refute any of the basic observations made thus far."
Goal post successfully moved. Even if no lawsuit happens, even if nobody is liable, it is still plagiarism because from their perspective it is.
So another claim right in the garbage bin from someone completely dishonest, much like the Pokemon quote in game. Everyone took this "silly" claim as fact because a) the user was promoting it as fact, and b) it validated the preconception (from the visual infringement argument) that they had copied Pokemon."I feel a little regretful for using "exactly" so flippantly here. I was trying to be silly but I think it gave an incorrect impression. I want to emphasize that while some elements are similar these meshes are not literally "exact" copies of each other....I did scale the models (uniformly)".
I think a lot of the plagiarism people will be eating their hat soon enough. These models are not "almost 1:1" as has been argued. Reading the Era comments on this are really funny. ResetEra Admin beginning the cope "I also want to remind people: You can commit plagiarism without actually being civilly or criminally liable for it. If Nintendo decides not to sue, or even if they try it and lose for whatever reason in Japanese court, that would not refute any of the basic observations made thus far."
Goal post successfully moved. Even if no lawsuit happens, even if nobody is liable, it is still plagiarism because from their perspective it is.
And the evidence for this claim is.....? Can't be the person claiming the models were stolen - confirmed fake. Can't be the inclusion of the word Pokemon in the game - confirmed fake. Back to square one of "the wolf pal looks like the wolf pokemon!". We await Nintendo suing over their ownership of the Wolf IP.NEWS FLASH: You don't need a 1:1 direct copy to be infringing on another's IP.