We should all be able to push back on someone stating a game looks better than all others. It's the status quo to challenge someone's claims. So no, I'm not being a victim. If he thinks HFW looks better, I can state he's wearing "only Sony 1st party" biased glasses.
You pushed back and so have others, but it seems like you're the only one complaining about pushback. That is a victim mentality. You should expect some type of pushback with your initial comment.
I have gone into the Starfield sales thread to talk about how the game wasn't performing well after the first 3 weeks with preliminary evidence. I knew Xbox fans weren't going to like my comment, so I was expecting some pushback.
I'm not going to say, "Look at this pushback! I can't post my opinion on my research?"
I expected it and then replied to every single response as to why I came to that conclusion.
I'm familiar with Nanite and how it works. I don't need to go over it.If you want to go into specifics about the rendering and pipeline, I will be more than happy to talk specifics. I work with UE5 everyday as my job and can go over with you, the scope of the engine's features.
You're so quick to defend without realizing that I never said I couldn't see detail, I said it doesn't stand out. We have seen terrain with gravel and debris scattered on the ground in games all the time, so what's going to make this game really stand out from the rest?
Not to forget that the character model appears to be lacking in some areas. It doesn't even appear close to some of the best ones out there.