Since this activsion deal was announced ive always been in the camp that this gives sony the oppurtunity to lock in or invest in key partners. They sort of began to do this initially but into the summer or fall of last year, they decided to go dark. So heres my question, was fighting this deal this hard worth it? Sony is still contractually obliged 3 years of cod, if it were to even get pulled, when it was annonced.
Heres what they gained:
-Bungie
-14 percent of from soft ware
-haven studios
-a 10 person cell phone team
Heres what theyve lost/ are in the process of losing:
-Activsion blizzard
-A new, arbitrary redefinition of the market where theyre the clear winner 70:30
-Investigations of the concept of exclusivity deals
-Japan potentially being cracked open by US regulators, who have no understanding of the market
-The ability to retaliate with their own acquisition's/ investments, particularly in Japan because of this new definition of the market
-Regulator oversight/intrigue for the games industry as a whole that will favor western companies
So my question is was all that worth it for what they gained? Was all of this worth less than spending a few billion, billions they already had earmarked for acquisitions to begin with, when it was a well known fact that the industry was consolidating instead of investesting in key partners? Was being cheap and saving a few billion, even if its more than a few, its to protect your place in the market worth all of that?
My conclusion is no, not at all. Whoever the person at sony or their legal council was that told them this was a good strategy should be fired. Everyone from the ceo, the treasurer, jim ryan, herman hulst, their lawyers etc.
Heres what they gained:
-Bungie
-14 percent of from soft ware
-haven studios
-a 10 person cell phone team
Heres what theyve lost/ are in the process of losing:
-Activsion blizzard
-A new, arbitrary redefinition of the market where theyre the clear winner 70:30
-Investigations of the concept of exclusivity deals
-Japan potentially being cracked open by US regulators, who have no understanding of the market
-The ability to retaliate with their own acquisition's/ investments, particularly in Japan because of this new definition of the market
-Regulator oversight/intrigue for the games industry as a whole that will favor western companies
So my question is was all that worth it for what they gained? Was all of this worth less than spending a few billion, billions they already had earmarked for acquisitions to begin with, when it was a well known fact that the industry was consolidating instead of investesting in key partners? Was being cheap and saving a few billion, even if its more than a few, its to protect your place in the market worth all of that?
My conclusion is no, not at all. Whoever the person at sony or their legal council was that told them this was a good strategy should be fired. Everyone from the ceo, the treasurer, jim ryan, herman hulst, their lawyers etc.