Ign gets tons more views then those other outlets. There reviews usually are at the top of the pile when you search for reviews on youtube aswell.
Starfield | Review & Discussion Thread
- Thread starter Gamernyc78
- Start date
Completely different genres why mention Spider-Man or ratchet & clank unless you're just trying to shit on playstation games in defense of an Xbox exclusive
Last edited by a moderator:
Dammit… I listed the major ones and forget IGN
There are others like a Saudit review that give 7 too.
Most reviewers are between 8-9… the 7 counters the 10.
Mid-high 80 I believe it is where it I’ll settle.
Joe will wreck this game. He gave Baldur's Gate 3 a 10, after that, yep, he won't be nice to Starfield
See, those weaknesses should put a game more around a 70 than 85, if the full scale was being used properly.Someone posted a review earlier:
Positives
+ Really good graphics: Textures and Illumination
+ Really well done quests (With lots of dialogue and different characters)
+ Great overall animations that help with the immersion.
+ Very Stable Performance and very few bugs.
+ Epic Ost
Negatives
- Bad enemy AI in general
- The spaceship combat is weak
- Inventory management is very difficult
- Weak character models and facial animations.
- The game doesn't explain much of its systems.
He gave it a 8.5
Any reviewer brushing aside negatives regarding the gameplay just because the graphics are nice is doing the job wrong.
Can't find a tweet where Tom Warren says that NG+ in Starfield is the way to go as an excuse to be reviewed good. Any help? I think it was mentioned here somewhere
i have seen this from several people. (that NG+ implementation is super innovative and better than Nier automata)
If reviewed properly without xbox astroturfer inflating the score this game should be around 60-70
It's not the PC gamers Bryan, it's the hate for MS. You know that to be true brotha.No need to take it personal bro, my brother is playing it on PC too and enjoying it. He did say that the menu's were a bit overwhelming but overall he says it's good.
I don't think anyone here has anything in particular against the game, just the way Microsoft bought Zenimax, hyped the game into the stratosphere and this is a by product of the circle of karma.
Most have nothing against PC gamers here.
I respect that but every single game this year has had a buggy experience on launch. This is no surprise. Even the GOTY BG3 had bugs and still an incomplete Act 3 content. Still is a great game.
My problem is the double standard. Yes, MS hyped the shit out of Starfield. They had to. There isn't a single XSX game that matches it. I don't fault them for that.
Alot of the complaints on the internet are unfounded or downright wrong. Some of these videos that show gameplay look horrible and nothing like what I'm experiencing. Granted I don't have a XSX and the PC version is better I'm sure but I wouldn't think by THAT much.
Last edited:
Yep, this seems to be the growing consensus amongst folks who are playing the game. For a lot of them it's the big negative of the game. Can't blame them. This game was shown off with space and planets that you get to go to in addition to a ship that is your very own and you HAVE FULL CONTROL OVER with FULL CUSTOMIZATION. We were seeing footage of our ship flying around in orbit with the planet in front of us. So when the game is in folks' hands and they're experiencing the opposite where it's loading screens popping up left and right and fast travel this fast travel that and not even being able to get near the planet with our ship of course that's gonna disappoint people.
Umm. No. Completely deserving of the score it got. Don't try to imply it's a flop. It's better than a lot of open world games today...and by far.
It's not even an openworld lol, you basically just traveling between closed locations, 99.9 % of which are randomly generated
