Starfield | Review & Discussion Thread
- Thread starter Gamernyc78
- Start date
I can see why Microsoft don't spend as much money anymore for marketing when you have others joining forums to do it for them free of charge.
I only posted facts about one of the most popular games right now.My account was created some days ago and it was probably approved today or yesterday.
It's the official release and it only went up to 250,000. Going down 249k...it's not looking good.Early access concurrent player count touched 248,000+ and estimated owners are predicted to be around 1 million so i doubt it's just Bethesda fans..
Yep astroturfing. nobody talks like marketing bullet points with every response like this
Well, If past Bethesda games are anything to go by then they will for the next decade.Bethesda games aren't linear one and done experience.
Ff16 sold 3 million in its first week & it was only on ps5 do you know how to count ...
Mr. Pichinini isn't so much a fanboy as professionally mentally illI love fanboys so much
I know I’ve said it before, but Xbox fans seem to have some kind of brain mutation that makes them project all the negatives of their beloved platform onto Sony, and it’s fucking hilarious.
wow so you can respond in a way that dont sounds like a marketing bullet point. Interesting
Never mind the game, can you make sense of this bullshit you posted? It’s good but disappointing, what?
How is 250,000 concurrent player count on steam is not looking good?...Also, Look at the time.We will see how it preforms tomorrow.I expect concurrent player count to rise.
if you're talking facts. Tell me this. why do you have to come to a gaming enthusiast forum to regurgitate the same talking points about this game? wouldn't everyone on here already know about Bethesda's history?
what's your goal? its not like you're talking about your experience of playing the game here.
This is largely incorrect. It's a pernicious rumour because BGS threw Austin under the bus with the bad 76 launch, but 76 was well supported by BGS teams and even had other studios (such as Arkane, ID Software, Zenimax Online, Irony Galaxy) helping out. Emil Pagliarulo (lead designer for Fallout 3, 4) was the design director for 76 , and recently the design director for Starfield. Project lead Jeff Gardiner was lead producer for FO4, senior producer for Skyrim. I'm sure it was B team somewhat, but it wasn't "created" by a side team at Bethesda as some pet project that they couldn't live up to - it brought to you by executive producer Todd Howard and Emil Pagliarulo.
What's funny about throwing Bethesda Austin under the bus is the biggest flaws with 76 aren't the bugs and such that people complained about, which would be evidenced by the smaller, less experienced development team and the addition of extra programmers from Arkane, but rather the core gameplay design. Chief of this was the lack of NPCs, immediately rectified in the first batch of content for 76. Who can be blamed for that failure of game design except Emil Palgiarulo as design director.
Not many games rise of the initial release concurrent players. I can think of 3? I'm sure there re more, but that isn't a lot.
This thread was about how a popular new game is performing. Everything else was replies to others comments.
