I actually expect that this week. Huge PR disaster but Sony loves that. Real masochists, they live for this shit.So what do you suggest Sony kill the game, refund and shutdown FireWalk immediately?
I actually expect that this week. Huge PR disaster but Sony loves that. Real masochists, they live for this shit.So what do you suggest Sony kill the game, refund and shutdown FireWalk immediately?
Even the lowest scores are saying the game have high quality and gameplay is good"Quality"
It is rated 6.4. talentless chubbs can reach that.
To kill the game? LolI actually expect that this week. Huge PR disaster but Sony loves that. Real masochists, they live for this shit.
so we value 'quality' just for gameplay? makes no sense. game average is 6,4, if gameplay is good and quality, means all other departments of the game is trash.But most the reviews are saying the gameplay is good, scores are turned down because of price mostly and it not being able to survive etc. So the quality isnt the issue
so we value 'quality' just for gameplay? makes no sense. game average is 6,4, if gameplay is good and quality, means all other departments of the game is trash.
it doesn't sound that all game is quality when you aren't picking and choosing, because, then Fallout 76 becomes 'quality' game..
a lot of reviewers are swayed by popular discourse. That's why nintendo games all get 90+ despite some of them being quite mid - because the narrative is that nintendo games are all incredibly high quality and fun. This game isn't nearly as bad as a 6.4.so we value 'quality' just for gameplay? makes no sense. game average is 6,4, if gameplay is good and quality, means all other departments of the game is trash.
it doesn't sound that all game is quality when you aren't picking and choosing, because, then Fallout 76 becomes 'quality' game..
ya'll need to calm down. The problem here isn't the quality of the game devs or the game they produced. the problem is they failed to read the market and sony failed to manage the product to suit the needs of the market in the launch window they selected. That's a failure of leadership, not of the talent. Sure you can say "blah blah blah woke characters" - but the failure lies in leadership for greenlighting this when they had about a year and a half of knowing that customer feedback to the game was incredibly negative. I don't think there needs to be mass firings, there needs to be a real honest conversation between Sony leadership and the studio heads about how much they need to tailor their products to fit the market. Then if employees object over personal political beliefs, that's when you let them go.
Yes, having good and polished shooting mechanics doesn't make up for other shit.so we value 'quality' just for gameplay? makes no sense. game average is 6,4, if gameplay is good and quality, means all other departments of the game is trash.
it doesn't sound that all game is quality when you aren't picking and choosing, because, then Fallout 76 becomes 'quality' game..
What's the other shit? Just askingYes, having good and polished shooting mechanics doesn't make up for other shit.
while i don't disagree, but other areas in the game should support gameplay too and how it is looking, it lacks in quality in other areas.No but gameplay is the most important part of games. Whether the fun lasts is another question. Also Fallout was a buggy mess
this game is perfect for gaming media and their virtue signalling. even they aren't bothered to support it.a lot of reviewers are swayed by popular discourse. That's why nintendo games all get 90+ despite some of them being quite mid - because the narrative is that nintendo games are all incredibly high quality and fun. This game isn't nearly as bad as a 6.4.
That it's just as boring as Overwatch. It actually seems like an Alibaba Guardian of the Galaxy skin for Overwatch.What's the other shit? Just asking
Fantastic OST / Audio is top notch
Great graphics
Extremely polished
Outside of character designs and I guess Pronouns... What else is so detrimental to the game?
I think Sony's failure to understand who their capture audience is is a massive blunder; no one wants to admit it, but shoving woke characters with pronouns at what is essentially a base of hetero-sexual males market is not going to end well.ya'll need to calm down. The problem here isn't the quality of the game devs or the game they produced. the problem is they failed to read the market and sony failed to manage the product to suit the needs of the market in the launch window they selected. That's a failure of leadership, not of the talent. Sure you can say "blah blah blah woke characters" - but the failure lies in leadership for greenlighting this when they had about a year and a half of knowing that customer feedback to the game was incredibly negative. I don't think there needs to be mass firings, there needs to be a real honest conversation between Sony leadership and the studio heads about how much they need to tailor their products to fit the market. Then if employees object over personal political beliefs, that's when you let them go.
Sony won't learn. The upcoming Fairgame$ is definitely going the exact same route, besides the fact that it will be another boring multiplayer game.I think Sony's failure to understand who their capture audience is is a massive blunder; no one wants to admit it, but shoving woke characters with pronouns at what is essentially a base of hetero-sexual males market is not going to end well.
I also scratched my head when I read a comment from one of the lead designers about white people needing to acknowledge their privilege. Things like that really put me off wanting to support this game; I was on the fence about whether I was going to get it or not, but in the end, I decided not to.
This forced diversity stuff really needs to end and end soon; people don't want it.
Just look at that Dustborn game; it is precisely the same thing and that has flopped even harder.
Couple that with the 40-buck asking price; it's just a failure on so many levels.
I think Sony should ultimately take all the blame. They bought this studio, and they are the ones that oked it.
The sad truth is, we probably would not be talking about this game if the studio had not been bought and released it under its own tag.
It would not of gotten half the flack and who knows, might of even sold ok with out all the negativity.
while i don't disagree, but other areas in the game should support gameplay too and how it is looking, it lacks in quality in other areas.
this game is perfect for gaming media and their virtue signalling. even they aren't bothered to support it.
Well, this past game had to sting. We don't know the official numbers, but the losses must be enormous.Sony won't learn. The upcoming Fairgame$ is definitely going the exact same route, besides the fact that it will be another boring multiplayer game.
I only hope that their single player games steer awsy from all this shit and focus on delivering their usual fantastic products.
Astro bot is going to print money, and I think it will be the game of the year.I’d say quality wise, outside of character designs, it needs modes and campaign.
The reason they arent virtue signalling is because its PS lol. Astrobot is safe. Next PS exclusive is gonna be getting shit on like all the others before they are released.
they will lose even more as they want to support it.Well, this past game had to sting. We don't know the official numbers, but the losses must be enormous.
We don't know how much has been lost—20 million, 50 million—but whatever it is, it will make them sit up and take a good look at themselves.
It is something that can not continue.