These shills still want another acquisition of publisher. Is it never enough for Xbox Cunts?
So Activision isn't enough for them to compete?
These shills still want another acquisition of publisher. Is it never enough for Xbox Cunts?
It is a huge risk to fund a brand new studio with no IP. It will be hard to attract talent to it as well. But if PS can bet on Deviation, Firewalk and Haven. then they should bet on him as wellTake-Two includes Zynga that I don't like, PC only studios and I have concerns about R* going forward. Why not back up Dan Houser new studio instead? Seems like the smarter bet.
It's not a huge risk, they just funded Haven and Firewalk. Dan Houser might not be as pretty but he founded created R* and wrote RDR2.It is a huge risk to fund a brande new studio with no IP. It will be hard to attract talent to it as well. If PS can bet on Deviation, Firewalk and Haven. then they should bet on him as well
I agree with you. They should bet on him.It's not a huge risk, they just funded Haven and Firewalk. Dan Houser might not be as pretty but he founded created R* and wrote RDR2.
Yeah, Microsoft's arguments in favour of the cloud deals being a remedy are sophomoric.Well they haven't, that's why ms have been forced to propose a new deal. Ms have been trying to argue the same for gamepass ultimate that cloud is just a feature. CMA was unmoved here.
None of the regulators see that as an issue though.
It does matter, cause those deals were not acceptable to the CMA. It's no different then Nvidia taking that deal. These companies taking the deal doesn't change the fact that CMA found issues with the deals themselves.
CMA identified 3 major competitors to MS in cloud gaming, Sony, Nvidia and Amazon. So they do see consider sony in cloud gaming.
You can read my reply again to see what I mean better. But this is just one of many reasons he needs to be kicked. The fact that Sony or Jimbo does not understand the PS brand is strong like this because it develops and focuses on hardware and the closed ecosystem of the hardware, and not because it releases some god damn games like what a typical publisher does speaks enough about why he’s leading PS the wrong way.
CMA will definitely fold now that the idiot Jim Ryan did so and fucked up big time.
Again he should have accepted the deal and help Microsoft with the merger? He didn't bet on regulators. Regulatory bodies are there for a reason. He only was against the merger after Xbox tried to screw them over and went public lying.
Either way who carws if he looks pathetic? He got a longer deal and by doing so, buys themself sometime to hopefully come up with a few things to eventually ween their audience off COD.
I promise you Jim doesn't care what fanboys and media shills thinks of him. He's the reason the merger almost crumbled.
It can fail but it's pretty much a 99% chance it won't now. With Playstation signing to continue having CoD on their system the CMA can't fight this anymore even if they threw out the console situation first.I really don't know how anyone can say "jimbo's bet on regulators was wrong". What, he should bet on some seer who said "deal will fail!" ?
Btw. Merge still can fail
See post 13,429. Reziel did a good job explaining.Explain what Jimbo screwed about this deal. Mind you that regulators are fighting against this merge and Microsoft, not Jimbo. Mind you that regulators or judges are up to decide will this deal go through or not, not Jimbo himself. He can just sit a watch.
Enough already. Explain what's changed from the point at which this was 100% blocked in April to now to make it 99% in favour of the deal. Remember that it all comes down to the CMA. A win in any other jurisdiction means nothing for MS' chances in the UK.It can fail but it's pretty much a 99% chance it won't now. With Playstation signing to continue having CoD on their system the CMA can't fight this anymore even if they threw out the console situation first.
These shills still want another acquisition of publisher. Is it never enough for Xbox Cunts?
Playstation x SquareEnix?
if it's a Square Enix acquisition, does it really benefit Sony? I don't see anything other than they just fully own them now.They pretty reliable over the years. Should have its own thread.
I dont know what it is!if it's a Square Enix acquisition, does it really benefit Sony? I don't see anything other than they just fully own them now.
It does benefit them of course. They will now have japanese publisher something they actually lack.... Japanese devs / talentif it's a Square Enix acquisition, does it really benefit Sony? I don't see anything other than they just fully own them now.
They pretty reliable over the years. Should have its own thread.
Do you know if it's possible the CMA issues a derogation and MS can close the deal if they keep Activision separate until they get the CMA final decision?Enough already. Explain what's changed from the point at which this was 100% blocked in April to now to make it 99% in favour of the deal. Remember that it all comes down to the CMA. A win in any other jurisdiction means nothing for MS' chances in the UK.
Do you know if it's possible the CMA issues a derogation and MS can close the deal if they keep Activision separate until they get the CMA final decision?
View attachment 1887
Well, the meltdowns would be enough for me.if it's a Square Enix acquisition, does it really benefit Sony? I don't see anything other than they just fully own them now.