God of War Ragnarok with Neutral reviews on Steam because the game can't run on PCs with less than 6 GB of VRAM (Update: Also because of forced PSN)
- Thread starter John Elden Ring
- Start date
I can repond to this when I get back upstairs to my PC, im making food so i'm my phone while I wait.
I've demonstrated in detail why you're completely wrong on this topic.
The numbers don't lie.
And your insistence on being wrong won't change the facts.
Delays kill hype. Loss of hype kills sales.
This isn't an opinion, it's counting.
You know you could have simply replied later? Or do you think that would kill any hype for your response?
Anyway, enjoy your food.
The numbers don’t lie.
You are reading them to your low PC standards.
Sony games have sold like shit on PC.
You blame it on delay and the lack of hype.
Then you have your fellow PC gamers begging for Bloodborne which is 9 years old.
Claiming it is easy money for Sony.
Why beg when most Sony games will be delayed and theres no hype for them cause of it.
Go figure.
Again, why did Witcher 3 sell more on PC than on PlayStation? Why did Baldur's Gate 3 do the same?
AAA Development for PC wouldn't even be worth it, in 99% of cases.
It is the console players that pay the bills.
Selling barely even 1 Million would never pay a 100+ Million game.
But that is what delusional PC-Players don't get...
I love how you're twisting yourself into a pretzel just to push your dogshit narratives, dawg =]]
1. Best = Best objectively, and for right now, we know at HD2 is hands down their best and fastest performing title as of this year, if Astro Bot's numbers release and we find out they did more than 12 million in 12 weeks, that's good for them and then they will be the best and fastest title.
2. This is what I meant by double dippers in the Rockstar community, just as Skyrim has been sold several times and bought several times, with each owner of one likely owning the others, Rockstar is no different, I personally got GTA V on PS3, Xbox 360, Xbox One, and PC.
3. Do we know it was erroneous? They never released a statement saying such to my knowledge, we just know they took access away and STEAM refunded those people, not Sony. Steam issued refunds automatically and to people who asked because the game could no longer be played in their countries.
4. less to play? What do you mean less to play? They just released another exclusive, and more are in the works, what makes them lesser quality?
The only takeaway from this is that Live-Service Games sell much better on PC than Singleplayer Games.
I just looked out of curiosity, this is my account's worth on Steam
Piracy is a legit concern and always should be. It’s best to release single player games on console first. Pc release later without denuvo bad press. There are a handful of outliers but those also tend to be better established genres and IPs with that particular consumer.
On the other end, expecting late ports to sell the same as their original launches is its own special kind of stupid too.
No one is in a rush to play these games and is why they may still find their way to a million units sold a year from now as others have.
On the other end, expecting late ports to sell the same as their original launches is its own special kind of stupid too.
No one is in a rush to play these games and is why they may still find their way to a million units sold a year from now as others have.
Yeah, but we got all of our Steam keys for free from devs. Somehow.
And we've also stolen these games at the same time. Somehow.
So sales is all that matters to determine a good game? FIFA is then one of the best franchises around? Minecraft the best game ever made?
Doesn't make any sense. Sure, there will be double dippers, but I doubt any company would be stupid enough to think double dippers could carry the costs of a port.
Maybe Sony though people would simply create a free account in a different country, like it's been happening since the very first PSN accounts without consequences. But PC gamers obviously did what they do best: cry.
And now here we are where, pussy devs still didn't enforce PSN linking because of crybabies.
Maybe you, with an Xbox past, are used to have very little good games over a generation from a platform holder. But Sony set higher standards for us, in both quality and quantity, which they are failing to maintain.
Games, when they are finally released, release buggy and with missing features. We also will never know how scope and gameplay mechanics are impacted during the design of the games because PC needs to be supported.
Just like the CSGO port on the 7th generation consoles right? And that one didn't have a expensive headset as barrier of entry.
Exceptions don’t make the rules.
I can give you dozens and dozens of games which sold better on console
Also why PC vs PlayStation? It should be PC vs Console.
Trying to be smart?
Didn't it have a 15 bucks barrier though, while it was f2p on PC? Do you also have any numbers to prove your point?
Exceptions don’t make the rule pal.
I have said that before.
Bar one game every Sony game has sold like shit on PC. The excuse being delayed release and no hype cause of it.
Yet here you are asking for 9 year old Bloodborne and claiming it will be easy money for Sony.
Make it make sense.
BTW the issue was fixed officially now. You won't get an error with a 4GB card.
CSGO only became F2P years ago. I bought it in 2013 for PC for 15 bucks. Users that play for free don't get access to better drops a d other perks. You have to buy the 15 bucks pass if you want that.
CSGO only became F2P years ago. I bought it in 2013 for PC for 15 bucks. Users that play for free don't get access to better drops a d other perks. You have to buy the 15 bucks pass if you want that.