I do agree in the sense that they don’t get put under the same pressure as Sony in terms of boundary pushing. If Nintendo can stick to Mario and Zelda games with no scrutiny, why can’t Sony stick to cinematic AAA games with familiar treatment? People just want EVERYTHING from Sony, which is partially their fault because they try to represent the whole industry, while Nintendo focuses on making sure their software is the most sought for on their platform.Are you guys pretending to not understand or am I doing a lousy job at explaining? Grubb, Dring, Ryckert, Shreier and other journalist manbabies are not saying "I know this game is for kids but I still enjoy it". I wouldn't have any issue with that. The issue I have is that they are treating Nintendo games like it's the Citizen Kane of gaming.
The perspective is that gaming has matured, it has become an artform with complex narratives and deep characters and Nintendo hasn't moved an inch from its 80s-90s roots. They still make the same games they always have and that's perfectly fine if you still enjoy them but the games media's adoration for Nintendo is entirely unwarranted.
Nintendo Switch will be their highest selling platform, amazing achievement but people also forget that they had to consolidate their console and handhelds to get there. Love my switch but the universal glazing is insane