Console Wars.this is the bizarre thing about all these twitter xbots. what games do they play?
Console Wars.this is the bizarre thing about all these twitter xbots. what games do they play?
You know how they do.They are basically making up shit now to create a situation, the preverbal victim looking for a crime.
A lot of this started last generation when people started treating the console war like a business and spouting nonsense for engagement.Time to add "Karem Jovian" to the list, too.
Some obnoxious Youtuber, who suddenly decided to wade into the console war for extra clout. These new-age gamers are absolute roaches.
The kicker? He's trying so damn hard to get Stellar Blade cancelled. What a P.O.S!
You reap what you sow. Acquisition-happy Xbots showed their true face and karma punched them in it so damn hard.
why was vigilante joker on era banned?
So many Xbox shills in this reddit thread like this guy pushing the bullshit that we need Xbox for competition. It's all they have left is "concerning" about Playstation winning
They are basically making up shit now to create a situation, the preverbal victim looking for a crime.
You know how they do.
it self evident, that PS studios dev competing against themselves, who can create better games. xbox was never ever in any competition as they never pushed any boundaries.Shill he may be, but I’m sorry to say he is not wrong in a philosophical sense. Competition is crucial. The driving spirit to be better than the other guy produces results. If Xbox does indeed kill the console and PS remains the only game in town, motivation turns to profit - not excellence. Longer console Gen, lower specs, lower investment in 1st party AAA not needing ‘loss leaders’. It concerns me.
Please try to be objective.
Shill he may be, but I’m sorry to say he is not wrong in a philosophical sense. Competition is crucial. The driving spirit to be better than the other guy produces results. If Xbox does indeed kill the console and PS remains the only game in town, motivation turns to profit - not excellence. Longer console Gen, lower specs, lower investment in 1st party AAA not needing ‘loss leaders’. It concerns me.
Please try to be objective.
That was might point in previous posts, there never was competition in over a decade between them.it self evident, that PS studios dev competing against themselves, who can create better games. xbox was never ever in any competition as they never pushed any boundaries.
also, people just overestimates how many games are created and how many pubs are there. there is plenty of competition for $.
Something that is often left out of the "competition is needed" argument is that Playstation in itself is in CONSTANT competition and the loss of xbox won't change that.The flaw in this way of thinking is that it reduces, or virtually eliminates, the internal drive of PS studios to make good games because they want to make good games.
What's more, apply this "competition is needed" logic to Xbox: if competition is such a motivator, why did they end up with turds like Redfall, deeply flawed flagship titles like Halo Infinite and Starfield, or outright busted games like Forza? Wasn't the motivation to compete with Sony's blockbusters enough?
I agree but even besides tht even with it being a greedy Corp like all others it does have a level of quality expected and just different culture. Sony devs are expected to push for quality generally and that won't end no matter who isn't or is there.Something that is often left out of the "competition is needed" argument is that Playstation in itself is in CONSTANT competition and the loss of xbox won't change that.
It competes with netflix for TV time. It competes with tablets and phones for screen time. It competes with a variety of other products for entertainment/leisure budgets of customers.
Even if Nintendo left, Sony still could not do whatever it wanted, because games are a luxury item and rely on massive sales volumes to be viable. They're not like cars that are a necessity. The moment Sony tries to charge $1000 for a console even as a monopoly is the moment that generation of Playstations dies. They learned that the hard way during PS3 and they won't forget that lesson.
Yeah this is a perfect point. Xbox is irrelevant. What competition is Xbox providing now that keeps Sony honest? None. They haven't been in the competition for a decade.The flaw in this way of thinking is that it reduces, or virtually eliminates, the internal drive of PS studios to make good games because they want to make good games.
What's more, apply this "competition is needed" logic to Xbox: if competition is such a motivator, why did they end up with turds like Redfall, deeply flawed flagship titles like Halo Infinite and Starfield, or outright busted games like Forza? Wasn't the motivation to compete with Sony's blockbusters enough?
Exactly.Yeah this is a perfect point. Xbox is irrelevant. What competition is Xbox providing now that keeps Sony honest? None. They haven't been in the competition for a decade.
Bruh how you running without an ad blocker